ATLASCYCLENSEAtlas Cycles (Haryana) Limited· CyclesMinimalNeutral
Announced Tue, 8 Jul · 13:58 IST

The Exchange had sought clarification from Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Limited for the quarter ended 31-Mar-2025 with respect to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. On basis of above the Company was required to clarify the following: -1. Financial results submitted is not as per format prescribed by SEBI The response of the Company is enclosed.

ATLASCYCLE · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reaction · full curve

Awaiting price reaction for this filing.

AI summary

Atlas Cycles submitted a clarification to NSE confirming that the date (24th May 2025) and place (Sahibabad) of signing on the Statement of Impact of Audit Qualifications are the same as those on its financial results. Along with this, the company filed its Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications for FY ended 31-Mar-2025. Standalone financials show total income of Rs. 28.80 crore, reported net profit of Rs. 9.51 crore (EPS Rs. 14.63), which drops to an adjusted net profit of Rs. 8.29 crore (EPS Rs. 12.75) after audit adjustments. The statutory auditor issued a qualified opinion, flagging five recurring issues (all for the 5th consecutive year): non-provisioning of interest on overdue payments to creditors and MSMEs, non-recognition of deferred tax, default in inter-corporate loan repayment with Rs. 4.95 crore of accumulated interest not booked (Rs. 99 lakh for FY25 alone), unpaid statutory audit fees of Rs. 1.39 crore, and non-compliance with FEMA on unrecorded export advances of Rs. 43 lakh.

Likely market impact

This filing flags serious and persistent financial reporting weaknesses. The auditor's adjustments cut reported profit by roughly Rs. 1.22 crore, and unprovided liabilities (interest, audit fees, loan defaults) could materially worsen the company's true financial position. For retail investors, repeated qualified opinions on a fifth-year basis are a strong caution signal regarding governance and earnings quality.