MHLXMIRUNSEMahalaxmi Rubtech LimitedMediumNeutral
Announced Mon, 23 Mar · 16:26 IST

The Exchange had sought clarification from Mahalaxmi Rubtech Limited for the quarter ended 31-Dec-2025 with respect to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. On basis of above the Company was required to clarify the following: -1. Limited Review Report/ Independent Auditor's Report is not in the format prescribed by SEBI. -2. Segment details not submitted. The response of the Company is enclosed.

MHLXMIRU · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reaction · full curve 14 horizons · vs prior close
+0.7%1-day move
₹163.93
prior close
base price
After-mkt
timing
5m10m15m30m1D2D3D4D5D7D15D1M2M3M
+0.7-3.0-6.6-0.4-1.0-0.6+11.6+6.1+8.6-23.6
Up moveDown movePending
AI summary

Mahalaxmi Rubtech has responded to NSE's query on its Q3 FY26 (quarter ended 31-Dec-2025) financial results. The Exchange flagged two issues: missing segment disclosure and an auditor's review report not in SEBI-prescribed format (UDIN not mentioned). The company clarified that it operates in only one reportable segment under Ind AS 108, so no separate segment reporting applies — the relevant note was left out due to an inadvertent clerical error and has now been included. On the UDIN issue, the company said the ICAI UDIN portal was facing technical glitches at the time of filing, so it had to submit results within SEBI's timeline without a UDIN; the UDIN was generated the next day and the amended auditor's certificate has been attached. For context, the actual Q3 FY26 numbers show revenue from operations of ₹2,739.30 lakhs (vs ₹2,996.42 lakh in Q3 FY25), PBT of ₹817.15 lakhs (up ~6.4% YoY), and PAT of ₹604.13 lakhs (vs ₹587.56 lakh). Nine-month PAT rose to ₹1,635.61 lakhs from ₹1,216.51 lakhs, with EPS of ₹15.40 vs ₹11.45.

Likely market impact

This is an administrative/compliance clarification with no material change to the reported financials. Shareholders should note modest YoY profit growth and that the issues were procedural oversights (missing note and portal glitch), not financial irregularities — likely no meaningful impact on stock price.