as per the pdf attached
Price
▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.
On the reaction day the stock moved 2.0 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 1.3 pts less than its Residential, Commercial Projects peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.
Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.
The board approved audited standalone financial results for Q4 and FY25 along with the auditor's report. Revenue from operations jumped to ₹696.67 lacs from nil in FY24, and total revenue rose to ₹782.50 lacs vs ₹23.97 lacs last year. The company swung back to a profit of ₹5.29 lacs compared to a loss of ₹53.41 lacs in FY24, with EPS of ₹0.16 vs ₹(1.60). However, operating cash flow was deeply negative at ₹(622.34) lacs, pointing to significant working capital outflows. Auditor M/s ANSK & Associates issued an unmodified opinion but highlighted that earlier reports (FY24 and Q3 FY25) carried a disclaimer of opinion on certain key balances, which the management has now accounted for and disclosed. The board also appointed new secretarial and internal auditors, and confirmed that ₹8.62 crores raised via preferential warrants was fully used for working capital with no deviation.
Return to profitability and a clean audit opinion are encouraging, but the large negative operating cash flow and the company's history of disclaimer opinions in prior audits warrant caution. Shareholders should watch whether the new revenue base translates into sustained cash generation.