Outcome of Board meeting held on 22.05.2025
Price
▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.
On the reaction day the stock moved 0.7 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 0.4 pts less than its Residential, Commercial Projects peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.
Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.
The Board approved audited standalone and consolidated financial results for Q4 and FY ended March 31, 2025, with the auditor (Jain P.C. & Associates) issuing an unmodified opinion. Revenue from operations grew about 30.7% YoY to Rs. 2,774.66 lakhs (FY24: Rs. 2,122.71 lakhs), but the company slipped into a net loss of Rs. 94.78 lakhs for FY25 versus a profit of Rs. 125.88 lakhs in FY24, driven by a sharp jump in finance costs to Rs. 1,667.34 lakhs (up ~65%). The balance sheet shows reserves and surplus at a negative Rs. 344.12 lakhs and non-current borrowings swelling to Rs. 19,404 lakhs (FY24: Rs. 13,292 lakhs). The Board also appointed Mr. Umang Pittie and Mr. Vaibhav Pittie, both relatives of CMD Shridhar Pittie, as Additional Whole-Time Directors for three years, and disclosed under SEBI's large corporate framework that qualified borrowings rose from Rs. 136.44 Cr to Rs. 198.59 Cr.
Despite strong top-line growth, shareholders should note the swing to a net loss, deeply negative reserves, and a leveraged balance sheet where debt dwarfs equity — a combination that raises solvency concerns even though the auditor gave a clean opinion. The Pittie-family director appointments reinforce promoter control but add to related-party concentration on the board.