BSESatchmo Holdings LtdHighNeutral
Announced Fri, 25 Jul · 18:58 IST

As intimated vide our letter Ref.: SATCHMO/013/2025-26 dated July 18, 2025, the Board of Directors of the Company met on Friday, July 25, 2025 and amongst other businesses, have considered ....

Going ConcernAdverse OpinionEmphasis Of MatterPat NegativeRevenue DeclineContingent Liabilities IncreasedResults View source PDF

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reaction · full curve

Awaiting price reaction for this filing.

AI summary

Satchmo Holdings' Board met on July 25, 2025 and approved unaudited financial results for Q1 FY26 (quarter ended June 30, 2025). On a standalone basis, revenue from operations collapsed to just Rs 8 lakh (vs Rs 31 lakh in Q1 FY25 and Rs 16 lakh in Q4 FY25), and the company posted a loss after tax of Rs 227 lakh versus a profit of Rs 2,923 lakh in the same quarter last year (which had an exceptional gain of Rs 3,250 lakh). Consolidated loss after tax was Rs 261 lakh. The auditor (KAMG & Associates) issued an adverse conclusion, stating the results do not give a true and fair view, citing accumulated losses, negative net worth, defaults on bank/financial institution dues, total outstanding financial indebtedness of Rs 8,507 lakh that is fully in default, and disputed liabilities of Rs 48,233 lakh (standalone) related to revoked OTS with JCF ARC and HDFC. The Board also discussed a fresh one-time full and final settlement proposal for the outstanding loan with JCF ARC, against whom NCLT insolvency proceedings (Section 7 of IBC) for Rs 38,595 lakh remain pending.

Likely market impact

This is a deeply distressed filing for shareholders. The auditor has flagged a clear going concern doubt and issued an adverse review report, the company has negative net worth, is in default on its loans, faces ongoing NCLT insolvency proceedings, and key statutory compliances (RERA, GST, TDS) remain in disarray. Stock remains a high-risk, deeply distressed investment with material risk of value erosion.