The Exchange had sought clarification from Silgo Retail Limited for the quarter ended 31-Dec-2025 with respect to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. On basis of above the Company was required to clarify the following: -1. Financial results submitted in XBRL with discrepancies. -2. Financial results submitted is not as per format prescribed by SEBI. The response of the Company is enclosed.
SILGO · price
▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.
NSE had raised two queries on Silgo Retail's Q3 FY26 (quarter ended 31-Dec-2025) financial results filed under SEBI LODR Regulation 33: (1) XBRL filing had discrepancies, and (2) results were not in SEBI-prescribed format. The company clarified these were inadvertent clerical errors — an extra row for the September quarter was included in the PDF and EPS details were missing, but the system did not allow a re-upload. The correct figures were used in the XBRL filing. Alongside the clarification, the company submitted its revised unaudited results: standalone Q3 revenue was ₹1,103.55 lakh with a profit after tax of ₹129.19 lakh (EPS ₹0.53), while 9M FY26 standalone PAT was ₹384.33 lakh. Consolidated Q3 PAT was ₹126.68 lakh (EPS ₹0.51). The auditor JKSS & Associates issued an unmodified review report stating nothing came to their attention suggesting material misstatement.
This is a procedural filing issue rather than a financial or governance concern — the auditor has signed off cleanly on the numbers. Short-term sentiment may be mildly negative due to poor disclosure hygiene, but there is no material impact on the underlying business or shareholder value.