BSEVistar Amar LtdLowNeutral
Announced Wed, 17 Sept · 13:18 IST

We are enclosing the Consolidated Report of the Scrutinizer dated 16th September, 2025 on remote e-voting and e-voting at the 41st AGM.

Board & Shareholder Meetings View source PDF

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reaction · full curve

Awaiting price reaction for this filing.

AI summary

Vistar Amar Limited held its 41st AGM on 16th September 2025 via Video Conference (3:00 PM to 3:39 PM), and all 9 resolutions were passed with the requisite majority. The resolutions covered adoption of FY25 audited financial statements, re-appointment of a retiring director, remuneration of statutory auditors, remuneration of the Managing Director and Executive Director/CFO, appointment of a new Non-Executive Independent Director (Ms. Chandni Gopal Khudai), appointment of a Secretarial Auditor for 5 years (FY26–FY30), and approval of material related party transactions with Amar Food Products and Amarsagar Seafoods Pvt Ltd. The promoter group holds roughly 65.65% of the 57.6 lakh equity shares, and on resolutions where promoters were 'interested' (resolutions 4, 5, 8 and 9) the entire promoter stake (37.81 lakh shares) was recorded as abstained, leaving only public non-institutional votes (5.09 lakh shares, or about 8.84% of total equity) to decide those items. Overall public participation in e-voting was modest at around 25.74% of public non-institutional shares, and 36 shareholders attended the meeting through VC. The scrutinizer, Isha Sumit Gupta of I S Gupta & Co., certified the results.

Likely market impact

This is a routine compliance filing — all standard AGM items were approved without meaningful dissent, so no immediate governance red flags or price-moving triggers for shareholders. Worth noting that a very small slice of public shareholders (about 26% of the free float) actually voted, so related-party and executive remuneration approvals were effectively carried by a thin margin of retail votes with promoters abstaining.