Considered and approved financial results for quarter ended 30.06.25

Revenue declinedProfit growth above 25%EBITDA margin expansionResults View source PDF Explain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

+4.1%Reaction day

₹6.32

prior close

—

announcement price

After-mkt

timing

Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used+0.0%+4.1% vs market

Residential, Commercial Projects peers, median of 52sector-0.0%+4.1% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 4.1 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 4.1 pts more than its Residential, Commercial Projects peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

—

10m

—

15m

—

30m

—

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

+4.1+0.0+4.1-0.0+4.1

Next day

-1.9+0.7-2.6-1.6-0.3

+2.8-0.1+3.0-1.6+4.4

+13.1+1.4+11.7-1.5+14.6

+22.6+2.6+20.0-0.7+23.4

+21.2+2.5+18.7-0.9+22.1

+7.6+2.2+5.4-1.1+8.7

15d

-9.0+1.9-10.9-0.8-8.2

-4.7+2.8-7.5-1.6-3.2

-6.2+1.2-7.4-3.6-2.6

-28.0+2.2-30.2-3.7-24.3

UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Residential, Commercial Projects peers, median of 52Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Vivid Mercantile Ltd reported its Q1 FY26 standalone unaudited results. Revenue from operations fell sharply to ₹169.24 lakhs, down about 82% from ₹947.90 lakhs in Q1 FY25. Total income dropped to ₹169.24 lakhs from ₹974.44 lakhs. However, profit before tax jumped to ₹139.35 lakhs from ₹50.35 lakhs, and profit after tax surged to ₹121.35 lakhs from ₹40.35 lakhs — roughly a 3x increase year-on-year. The profit jump is largely because total expenses collapsed to ₹29.89 lakhs (from ₹924.09 lakhs), driven by a much smaller stock-in-trade purchase and a favourable change in inventory accounting. EPS stood at ₹0.12 versus ₹0.40 in the year-ago quarter. The auditor (AKGVG & Associates) issued a clean limited review report with no qualifications.

Likely market impact

Mixed picture for shareholders: top-line has collapsed sharply, which is a red flag for business momentum, but bottom-line has more than tripled on a very low cost base. The company remains very small with negligible debt and depreciation, so small shifts in inventory and trading volumes heavily swing earnings. Investors should watch whether the revenue weakness is temporary or a sign of shrinking business activity before drawing conclusions on profitability.