Models
AMAGI MEDIA LABS LIMITEDAMAGIIT - Services
₹19per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹19implied FY26 P/E —× · EV/EBITDA 2.8×
Against CMP ₹580.00−96.6%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3172%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹18₹22
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹310₹727
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 39 |
| PV of terminal value | 100 |
| Enterprise value | 139 |
| less net debt | 283 |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 422 |
| ÷ 21.63 crore shares | ₹19 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 22 |
| 10.50% | 19 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 |
| 11.00% | 19 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| 11.50% | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 20 |
| 12.00% | 18 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹580.00; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 15 · 19 · 24 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.85 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.49 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.14 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,506 | 1,626 | 1,756 | 1,897 | 2,048 | 2,212 |
| growth % | — | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| EBITDA | 50 | 54 | 58 | 63 | 68 | 73 |
| margin % | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| less depreciation | (22) | (23) | (25) | (27) | (29) | (31) |
| EBIT | 29 | 31 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 42 |
| less tax on EBIT | (5) | (6) | (6) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| NOPAT | 24 | 25 | 27 | 30 | 32 | 35 |
| add depreciation | 22 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 |
| less capex | (23) | (24) | (27) | (30) | (33) | (37) |
| less working-capital build | — | (14) | (15) | (16) | (17) | (19) |
| Free cash flow to firm | — | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | |
| Present value | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 0, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 29 | 31 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 42 |
| Interest at 8% on debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Profit before tax | 31 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 42 | |
| Profit after tax | 72 | 25 | 27 | 30 | 32 | 35 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 283 | 293 | 303 | 313 | 323 | 332 |
| Working capital | 172 | 186 | 201 | 217 | 234 | 253 |
| Net block and other assets | 1,898 | 1,900 | 1,902 | 1,906 | 1,911 | 1,917 |
| Debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity | 1,757 | 1,782 | 1,810 | 1,839 | 1,871 | 1,906 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 34 | 37 | 40 | 43 | 47 | |
| Investing (capex) | (24) | (27) | (30) | (33) | (37) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 8% | 3.3% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹19 | (96.6)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.