₹201per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹201implied FY26 P/E 16.7× · EV/EBITDA 13.1×
Against CMP ₹440.50−54.4%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies40.1%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3176%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹157₹288
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 91 |
| PV of terminal value | 286 |
| Enterprise value | 376 |
| less net debt | 11 |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 387 |
| ÷ 1.93 crore shares | ₹201 |
76% of the value sits after FY31. Usual when return on capital sits near the cost of capital; the 5 explicit years carry little of it.
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 207 | 222 | 240 | 261 | 288 |
| 10.50% | 192 | 204 | 218 | 236 | 257 |
| 11.00% | 178 | 189 | 201 | 215 | 232 |
| 11.50% | 167 | 176 | 186 | 198 | 212 |
| 12.00% | 157 | 164 | 173 | 183 | 195 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹440.50; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 168 · 200 · 239 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.65 |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.63 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | +0.35 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 18 | 28 | 44 | 48 | 53 | 58 | 63 | 69 | 76 |
| growth % | 16.0 | 57.9 | 56.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| EBITDA | 4 | 16 | 31 | 29 | 31 | 34 | 38 | 41 | 45 |
| margin % | 22.0 | 58.7 | 70.5 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 59.6 |
| less depreciation | (1) | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (3) |
| EBIT | 3 | 16 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 43 |
| less tax on EBIT | (7) | (8) | (9) | (9) | (10) | (11) | |||
| NOPAT | 20 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 29 | 31 | |||
| add depreciation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| less capex | (21) | (2) | (20) | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (3) |
| less working-capital build | — | (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | |||
| Free cash flow to firm | (5) | (5) | (4) | — | 20 | 22 | 24 | 25 | 28 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||||
| Present value | 19 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 17 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 2, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 27 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 43 |
| Interest at 8% on debt | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
| Profit before tax | 30 | 32 | 35 | 39 | 43 | |
| Profit after tax | 23 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 29 | 31 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 13 | 33 | 55 | 78 | 104 | 131 |
| Working capital | 25 | 28 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 40 |
| Net block and other assets | 96 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 95 | 96 |
| Debt | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Equity | 112 | 134 | 158 | 184 | 212 | 244 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 21 | 23 | 25 | 28 | 30 | |
| Investing (capex) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (3) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 20 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 27 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 20 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 27 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 9.5% | 59.6% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹201 | (54.4)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.