₹100per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹100implied FY19 P/E 12.4× · EV/EBITDA 5.9×
Against CMP ₹399.05−75.0%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY2455%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹78₹142
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY20–FY24 free cash flow | 104 |
| PV of terminal value | 127 |
| Enterprise value | 231 |
| less net debt | (52) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 179 |
| ÷ 1.80 crore shares | ₹100 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 103 | 110 | 119 | 129 | 142 |
| 10.50% | 96 | 101 | 108 | 117 | 127 |
| 11.00% | 89 | 94 | 100 | 106 | 115 |
| 11.50% | 83 | 87 | 92 | 98 | 105 |
| 12.00% | 78 | 82 | 86 | 91 | 96 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹399.05; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 57 · 98 · 142 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.96 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.25 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.04 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 474 | 512 | 553 | 598 | 646 | 697 |
| growth % | — | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| EBITDA | 39 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 53 | 57 |
| margin % | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| less depreciation | (21) | (23) | (25) | (27) | (29) | (31) |
| EBIT | 18 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 26 |
| less tax on EBIT | (1) | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| NOPAT | 17 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 24 |
| add depreciation | 21 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 |
| less capex | 0 | 0 | (7) | (16) | (26) | (38) |
| less working-capital build | — | (4) | (4) | (5) | (5) | (6) |
| Free cash flow to firm | — | 37 | 32 | 27 | 20 | 12 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | |
| Present value | 35 | 27 | 20 | 14 | 8 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 72, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 18 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 26 |
| Interest at 7.7% on debt | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) | |
| Profit before tax | 13 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 20 | |
| Profit after tax | 13 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 19 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 20 | 52 | 79 | 100 | 115 | 122 |
| Working capital | 51 | 55 | 59 | 64 | 69 | 74 |
| Net block and other assets | 262 | 239 | 221 | 210 | 207 | 214 |
| Debt | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 |
| Equity | 129 | 142 | 155 | 171 | 188 | 207 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 31 | 34 | 38 | 41 | 45 | |
| Investing (capex) | 0 | (7) | (16) | (26) | (38) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 31 | 27 | 21 | 15 | 7 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 31 | 27 | 21 | 15 | 7 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY19 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 8% | 8.2% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹100 | (75.0)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.