Models
INDIAN WOOD PRODUCTS CO LIWPPaper Forest & Jute Products
₹4per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹4implied FY26 P/E 5.4× · EV/EBITDA 5.8×
Against CMP ₹34.40−89.5%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3173%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹1₹10
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹28₹39
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 24 |
| PV of terminal value | 64 |
| Enterprise value | 88 |
| less net debt | (65) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 23 |
| ÷ 6.40 crore shares | ₹4 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| 10.50% | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 11.00% | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 11.50% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 12.00% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹34.40; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 1 · 4 · 7 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.81 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.54 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.12 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 182 | 192 | 226 | 229 | 231 | 233 | 235 | 238 | 240 |
| growth % | 2.5 | 5.3 | 17.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| EBITDA | 10 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| margin % | 5.6 | 7.4 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| less depreciation | (3) | (3) | (3) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) |
| EBIT | 7 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| less tax on EBIT | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | |||
| NOPAT | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
| add depreciation | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| less capex | (3) | (1) | (3) | (4) | (4) | (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) |
| less working-capital build | — | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | |||
| Free cash flow to firm | 8 | 8 | 9 | — | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||||
| Present value | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 65, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Interest at 9.3% on debt | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) | (6) | |
| Profit before tax | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Profit after tax | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends | (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| Working capital | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 85 |
| Net block and other assets | 446 | 447 | 447 | 448 | 449 | 449 |
| Debt | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| Equity | 363 | 367 | 370 | 374 | 378 | 382 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| Investing (capex) | (4) | (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 1% | 6.7% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹4 | (89.5)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.