Models
INNOVATIVE TECH PACK LTD.BSE 523840Industrial Products
₹51per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹51implied FY20 P/E 421.7× · EV/EBITDA 5.5×
Against CMP ₹14.50+249.0%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies(20.0)%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY2556%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹41₹70
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹13₹27
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY21–FY25 free cash flow | 59 |
| PV of terminal value | 73 |
| Enterprise value | 132 |
| less net debt | (18) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 114 |
| ÷ 2.25 crore shares | ₹51 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 52 | 55 | 59 | 64 | 70 |
| 10.50% | 49 | 51 | 55 | 58 | 63 |
| 11.00% | 46 | 48 | 51 | 54 | 57 |
| 11.50% | 43 | 45 | 47 | 50 | 53 |
| 12.00% | 41 | 42 | 44 | 46 | 49 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹14.50; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 37 · 50 · 65 |
| Draws below the CMP | 0% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.91 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.35 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | +0.11 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 144 | 150 | 156 | 162 | 169 | 176 | 183 |
| growth % | — | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| EBITDA | 22 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| margin % | 15.6 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
| less depreciation | (11) | (12) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (14) | (15) |
| EBIT | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 |
| less tax on EBIT | (3) | (3) | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) | |
| NOPAT | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | |
| add depreciation | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 15 |
| less capex | — | 0 | 0 | (4) | (8) | (13) | (18) |
| less working-capital build | — | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
| Free cash flow to firm | — | — | 21 | 18 | 15 | 11 | 7 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||
| Present value | 20 | 15 | 11 | 8 | 4 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 21, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 |
| Interest at 8% on debt | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | |
| Profit before tax | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | |
| Profit after tax | 2 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 3 | 23 | 40 | 53 | 63 | 69 |
| Working capital | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Net block and other assets | 116 | 103 | 94 | 89 | 87 | 90 |
| Debt | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Equity | 47 | 55 | 62 | 71 | 79 | 88 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 20 | 21 | 22 | 22 | 23 | |
| Investing (capex) | 0 | (4) | (8) | (13) | (18) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 20 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 6 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 20 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 6 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY20 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 4% | 15.8% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹51 | 249.0% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.