₹45per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹45implied FY26 P/E 7.9× · EV/EBITDA 6.0×
Against CMP ₹225.00−79.8%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY31107%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹36₹64
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹99₹424
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | (26) |
| PV of terminal value | 376 |
| Enterprise value | 350 |
| less net debt | 178 |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 528 |
| ÷ 11.61 crore shares | ₹45 |
107% of the value sits after FY31. Usual when return on capital sits near the cost of capital; the 5 explicit years carry little of it.
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 47 | 50 | 54 | 59 | 64 |
| 10.50% | 43 | 46 | 49 | 53 | 58 |
| 11.00% | 41 | 43 | 45 | 49 | 52 |
| 11.50% | 38 | 40 | 42 | 45 | 48 |
| 12.00% | 36 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 44 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹225.00; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 33 · 45 · 57 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.76 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.48 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.38 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 377 | 431 | 491 | 560 | 638 | 727 | 829 |
| growth % | — | 14.1 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 |
| EBITDA | 48 | 58 | 66 | 75 | 86 | 97 | 111 |
| margin % | 12.6 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
| less depreciation | (1) | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| EBIT | 47 | 56 | 64 | 73 | 84 | 95 | 109 |
| less tax on EBIT | (15) | (17) | (19) | (21) | (24) | (28) | |
| NOPAT | 42 | 48 | 54 | 62 | 71 | 81 | |
| add depreciation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| less capex | (5) | (49) | (56) | (49) | (38) | (23) | (3) |
| less working-capital build | — | (26) | (30) | (34) | (39) | (44) | |
| Free cash flow to firm | (18) | — | (33) | (22) | (8) | 12 | 36 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||
| Present value | (32) | (19) | (6) | 8 | 23 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 34, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 56 | 64 | 73 | 84 | 95 | 109 |
| Interest at 4.9% on debt | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | |
| Profit before tax | 63 | 72 | 82 | 94 | 107 | |
| Profit after tax | 44 | 47 | 53 | 61 | 70 | 79 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 212 | 178 | 154 | 146 | 156 | 191 |
| Working capital | 186 | 212 | 242 | 276 | 314 | 358 |
| Net block and other assets | 339 | 394 | 441 | 477 | 497 | 498 |
| Debt | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 |
| Equity | 681 | 727 | 780 | 841 | 911 | 990 |
| Balance check | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 22 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 38 | |
| Investing (capex) | (56) | (49) | (38) | (23) | (3) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | (34) | (24) | (9) | 10 | 35 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | (34) | (24) | (9) | 10 | 35 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 14% | 13.4% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹45 | (79.8)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.