Models
SYNCOM FORMU (I) LTDSYNCOMFPharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
₹9per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹9implied FY26 P/E 9.5× · EV/EBITDA 10.8×
Against CMP ₹19.61−54.5%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3176%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹7₹13
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹10₹23
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 203 |
| PV of terminal value | 632 |
| Enterprise value | 835 |
| less net debt | 4 |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 839 |
| ÷ 94.00 crore shares | ₹9 |
76% of the value sits after FY31. Usual when return on capital sits near the cost of capital; the 5 explicit years carry little of it.
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 10.50% | 9 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| 11.00% | 8 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| 11.50% | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| 12.00% | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹19.61; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 7 · 9 · 11 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.68 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.67 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | +0.15 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 224 | 263 | 465 | 489 | 514 | 539 | 566 | 595 | 624 |
| growth % | — | 17.5 | 76.6 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| EBITDA | 20 | 30 | 54 | 77 | 81 | 85 | 89 | 94 | 99 |
| margin % | 8.8 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
| less depreciation | (5) | (5) | (5) | (7) | (7) | (7) | (7) | (8) | (8) |
| EBIT | 15 | 25 | 49 | 71 | 74 | 78 | 82 | 86 | 91 |
| less tax on EBIT | (17) | (18) | (19) | (20) | (21) | (22) | |||
| NOPAT | 54 | 56 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 68 | |||
| add depreciation | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| less capex | (21) | (8) | (10) | (12) | (12) | (12) | (11) | (11) | (10) |
| less working-capital build | — | (5) | (5) | (5) | (6) | (6) | |||
| Free cash flow to firm | (10) | (14) | 13 | — | 46 | 49 | 53 | 57 | 61 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||||
| Present value | 43 | 42 | 41 | 39 | 38 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 1, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 71 | 74 | 78 | 82 | 86 | 91 |
| Interest at 8% on debt | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
| Profit before tax | 74 | 78 | 82 | 86 | 90 | |
| Profit after tax | 0 | 56 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 68 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 5 | 51 | 100 | 153 | 209 | 270 |
| Working capital | 99 | 104 | 109 | 115 | 120 | 126 |
| Net block and other assets | 430 | 435 | 440 | 444 | 447 | 448 |
| Debt | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Equity | 415 | 471 | 530 | 592 | 657 | 726 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 58 | 61 | 64 | 67 | 70 | |
| Investing (capex) | (12) | (12) | (11) | (11) | (10) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 46 | 49 | 53 | 57 | 61 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 46 | 49 | 53 | 57 | 61 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 5% | 15.8% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹9 | (54.5)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.