₹76per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹76implied FY26 P/E 5.3× · EV/EBITDA 6.1×
Against CMP ₹1,610.00−95.3%close of 2026-09-10
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3173%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹56₹115
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹695₹1,653
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 122 |
| PV of terminal value | 337 |
| Enterprise value | 459 |
| less net debt | (75) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 384 |
| ÷ 5.09 crore shares | ₹76 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 78 | 85 | 93 | 103 | 115 |
| 10.50% | 72 | 77 | 83 | 91 | 101 |
| 11.00% | 66 | 70 | 76 | 82 | 90 |
| 11.50% | 60 | 64 | 69 | 74 | 80 |
| 12.00% | 56 | 59 | 63 | 68 | 73 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹1,610.00; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 58 · 76 · 96 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.82 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.55 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.02 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 243 | 240 | 238 | 236 | 233 | 231 | 229 |
| growth % | — | (1.0) | (1.0) | (1.0) | (1.0) | (1.0) | (1.0) |
| EBITDA | 92 | 75 | 74 | 74 | 73 | 72 | 71 |
| margin % | 37.9 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 |
| less depreciation | (11) | (26) | (26) | (26) | (25) | (25) | (25) |
| EBIT | 81 | 49 | 48 | 48 | 47 | 47 | 46 |
| less tax on EBIT | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | |
| NOPAT | 39 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 37 | 37 | |
| add depreciation | 11 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| less capex | (131) | (35) | (35) | (33) | (32) | (31) | (30) |
| less working-capital build | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Free cash flow to firm | (49) | — | 30 | 31 | 31 | 32 | 32 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||
| Present value | 29 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 20 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 112, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 49 | 48 | 48 | 47 | 47 | 46 |
| Interest at 16.8% on debt | (19) | (19) | (19) | (19) | (19) | |
| Profit before tax | 30 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 28 | |
| Profit after tax | 63 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 22 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 37 | 53 | 69 | 85 | 102 | 120 |
| Working capital | 71 | 70 | 70 | 69 | 68 | 68 |
| Net block and other assets | 815 | 824 | 832 | 838 | 844 | 849 |
| Debt | 112 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 112 |
| Equity | 737 | 761 | 784 | 806 | 829 | 850 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 50 | 49 | 49 | 48 | 47 | |
| Investing (capex) | (35) | (33) | (32) | (31) | (30) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 16 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 18 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 16 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 18 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | -1% | 31.2% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹76 | (95.3)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.