Promoters control 94.85% pre-IPO equity stake
our Promoters, Sunu Mathew and Vertical Holdings II Pte. Ltd., hold, in aggregate, 94.85% of our issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital (on a fully diluted basis)
Leap India IPO is a mainboard IPO raising ₹2,480 Cr at ₹151 – ₹159 a share. It listed on 14 Aug 2026 at ₹166, +4.3% against its issue price of ₹159, and trades at ₹144 today (−9.2% since issue). It was subscribed 8.38× in total.
8.4 times more demand than shares on offer
populated partly populated we hold nothing here — the tab says why
Read from the 474-page prospectus. Indian prospectuses list hundreds of risk factors, most of them generic boilerplate. These are the 14 specific to this company; 486 generic ones were skipped. Every one is quoted verbatim with its page, so you can check it against the document.
our Promoters, Sunu Mathew and Vertical Holdings II Pte. Ltd., hold, in aggregate, 94.85% of our issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital (on a fully diluted basis)
our pallets contributed to 62.17%, 67.90% and 72.23% of our revenue from operations in Fiscals 2026, 2025 and 2024
On January 8, 2025, we acquired CHEP India Private Limited and pursuant to order dated April 17, 2025, from the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, CHEP India (our erstwhile wholly owned subsidiary) was merged with our Company with effect from June 2, 2025
19,889,503 Equity Shares held by Sunu Mathew, one of our Promoters, and Matyas Possessiones Private Limited ... had been pledged in favour of Catalyst Trusteeship Limited ... Upon re-creation of such pledge ... any invocation of such pledge could dilute the shareholding
Trade receivables as a % of revenue from operations 35.96% 42.69% 39.35% ... integration of newly acquired customers and the alignment of their contractual commercial terms with ours, required additional time and contributed to delays in collections
we procure forklifts from China which exposes us to geopolitical, regulatory, logistical, economic and operational uncertainties ... increase in polymer prices ... driven by the Iran-US/Israel conflict in Fiscal 2026, which disrupted supply chains
Attrition Rate for MHE operators 56.00% 47.00% 65.00% ... Attrition rate of KMPs (%) 33.00% 67.00% 67.00%
in March, 2024, there was an incident involving the compromise of the password for the email account belonging to our marketing department, further, in November, 2024, our firewall system became unresponsive due to suspicious traffic, and in May, 2025, there was an anonymous system attack on 'TARON' domain emails
There were instances where the audit trail (edit log) was not enabled at the database level for certain periods, and in some cases, the feature was periodically disabled or not available in the software version used.
We have had an instance where a former employee of our Company has misappropriated our proprietary data, on account of which we have lodged a complaint dated August 29, 2025 with the Dindoshi Police Station, Mumbai, Maharashtra against the former employee.
we had an incident in April 2025 where an oil spill resulted in the contamination of certain of our pallets. While we were able to recover the associated costs due to contamination from our customers, there is no assurance that such an incident will not occur in the future.
Against our Company... Tax proceedings 66... Material civil litigation 1... Aggregate amount involved* (in ₹ million) 225.40^^ ...Of which ₹204.39 million relates to outstanding tax proceedings against our Company.
our top ten suppliers and service providers contributed 63.27%, 60.00% and 77.00% of our total purchases in Fiscals 2026, 2025 and 2024
the emergence of new technologies in pallets, containers or MHEs design or components could pose a significant threat to our competitive position. If these innovations lead to the development of more cost-effective or efficient alternatives, customers and other supply chain participants may be drawn to these new options
Extracted from the issuer’s own prospectus and ranked by how specific and material each risk is to this company. Severity is our assessment of the disclosure, not a prediction — and nothing here is a recommendation to apply to this issue.
The issuer’s own summary of outstanding legal proceedings — SEBI requires this table in every prospectus. Counts and amounts are as disclosed.
| Against | Criminal | Tax | Other material | Amount at stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The company | 2 | 66 | 2 | ₹20 Cr |
| Subsidiaries | 0 | 6 | 0 | ₹2.7 Cr |
| Promoters | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Directors | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Group companies | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Income tax (CIPL, now merged into Company) AY 2020-21: disallowance of ₹353.51 million leading to demand of ₹29.44 million; CIT(A) partly allowed appeal on March 13, 2026; Company filed further appeal before ITAT
CENVAT credit demand on Company for FY 2016-17: revised demand of ₹54.56 million plus interest by CGST Commissioner Thane; appeal pending before CESTAT Mumbai
Income tax (CMEPL, merged into CIPL/Company) AY 2022-23: demand of ₹41.99 million on assessed income of ₹143.38 million; CIT(A) dismissed appeal on March 13, 2026; Company filed further appeal before ITAT
Radhakrishna Foodland arbitration: Company originally claimed ₹39.73 million; Arbitrator awarded only ₹8.69 million on October 28, 2025; Company filed Section 34 petition before Bombay HC partially challenging the award
Sanjiv Gupta (Independent Director) accused in 2016 FIR (Sections 406/419/420/467/468/471/474/477A/120B IPC) by M/s Suvans Softo in connection with GETIT for alleged cheating/non-remittance of sale proceeds; ASJ Court Rohini granted interim stay on cognizance notice on February 2, 2023
Amounts converted from ₹ million to ₹ crore (1 crore = 10 million). The only aggregate amounts explicitly stated in the section are the tax-claims table totals: Company ₹204.39 million (13 direct + 53 indirect tax), Subsidiaries ₹27.05 million (6 indirect tax), Promoters 1 direct-tax case (not quantifiable); aggregate tax-claim exposure = ₹231.44 million (₹23.144 crore). No grand total across criminal/civil/regulatory matters is stated. The 2 criminal matters by the Company are (i) cheque dishonour complaint against SAJM Brand Hub for ₹6.549 million plus 18% p.a. interest, and (ii) multiple complaints against former employee Vinay Kumar Gupta for alleged breach of trust/misappropriation (amount not quantified). 1 civil matter against the Company is a trademark/copyright suit by Leaap International (Madras HC) seeking damages of ₹1.01 million in the plaint, preceded by a legal notice claiming preliminary damages of ₹20.00 million. Materiality threshold is ₹22.85 million (5% of avg absolute PAT); consequently tax matters aggregating above this threshold are individually disclosed. Outstanding trade payables to creditors total ₹863.33 million (₹86.333 crore) including one material creditor of ₹99.70 million.. Outstanding means unresolved — a listed case is an exposure, not a verdict.
What the issuer and the exchanges published. Everything else on this tab is read out of these.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.
Which institutions were allotted shares before bidding opened, and how many.
Where physical applications could be submitted.
The issuer's own "basis of issue price": the earnings multiples it is asking for, and the peer companies it chose to compare itself against.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.