Extreme revenue dependence on government clients
Revenue from Government 3,449.39 ... % of Revenue from Operations 99.98
Technocraft Ventures IPO is a mainboard IPO raising ₹252 Cr at ₹200 – ₹212 a share. It listed on 14 Aug 2026 at ₹284, +34.0% against its issue price of ₹212, and trades at ₹438 today (+106.4% since issue). It was subscribed 39× in total.
38.7 times more demand than shares on offer
populated partly populated we hold nothing here — the tab says why
Read from the 632-page prospectus. Indian prospectuses list hundreds of risk factors, most of them generic boilerplate. These are the 13 specific to this company; 371 generic ones were skipped. Every one is quoted verbatim with its page, so you can check it against the document.
Revenue from Government 3,449.39 ... % of Revenue from Operations 99.98
Our project portfolio has historically been concentrated in projects in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan
our related party transactions with VVIP Infratech Limited ... Purchase & Job Work 111.38 [FY26] ... 657.43 [FY25] ... 606.03 [FY24]
Our Company is unable to trace certain historical corporate records and documents, including certain forms filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC)
a tax demand of ₹17.18 million (towards CGST, SGST, and IGST), along with an equivalent penalty under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, aggregating to a total demand of approximately ₹ 34.38 million
trade receivables and inventories together form a substantial part of our non-cash current assets, constituting 79.50%, 72.93% and 74.59% of total non-cash current assets
Our Promoters, members of our Promoter Group and relatives of our Promoters & Promoter Group have mortgaged their personal properties and provided personal guarantees for our borrowings
Company is executing 07 projects under the joint ventures with unexecuted contract value of ₹ 9,176.24 million, out of our total Order Book of ₹ 13,207.32 million
we had issued bank guarantees amounting to ₹ 1,680.33 million ... towards securing our financial / performance obligations under our ongoing projects
Number of Material civil litigation** 08 Aggregate amount involved* (₹ in million) 981.16
the right of the client to suspend or unilaterally terminate the contract, including without assigning any reason or for reasons beyond our control
Attrition Rate (%) – (B/(A+C)/2)*100 1.20 26.78
such transfers were affected after the timelines prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013
Extracted from the issuer’s own prospectus and ranked by how specific and material each risk is to this company. Severity is our assessment of the disclosure, not a prediction — and nothing here is a recommendation to apply to this issue.
The issuer’s own summary of outstanding legal proceedings — SEBI requires this table in every prospectus. Counts and amounts are as disclosed; the disclosed aggregate at stake is ₹10.0 Cr.
| Against | Criminal | Tax | Other material | Amount at stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The company | 5 | 14 | 8 | ₹10.0 Cr |
| Promoters | 3 | 1 | 0 | ₹0.0 Cr |
| Directors | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Writ Petition CWJC 4742/2026 by Company vs BUIDCo/State of Bihar (Jehanabad Sewerage, AMRUT 2.0): challenging Additional Performance Guarantee demand initially ~₹397.86M, revised to ~₹282.73M; ₹165.79M bank guarantee furnished per Court order dated May 14, 2026
Writ Petition CWJC 6702/2026 by Company vs BUIDCo/State of Bihar (Siwan Sewerage, AMRUT 2.0): challenging Additional Performance Guarantee demand of ₹301.13M; ₹200.00M bank guarantee furnished per Court order dated May 14, 2026
Arbitration 02/2021 by Company vs State of Rajasthan (Udaipur sewerage scheme, riverbank/lateral networks): cumulative claim of ₹109.20M (price escalation, damages, reimbursement, interest @ 9% p.a. compounded monthly); arbitration currently suspended under Section 29-A Arbitration Act
Tax proceedings against Company (as per SEBI table): 3 direct-tax cases (₹7.81M) + 5 indirect-tax cases (₹91.98M) = 8 cases, aggregate ₹99.79M
FIR 393/2023 at PS Kotwali, Jaunpur against Promoter/Director Sanjay Tyagi + 3 others (IPC §§283, 290, 431, 304A – culpable homicide not amounting to murder): fatal sewer-pit collapse killing a labourer; charge sheet filed Mar 19, 2024; case pending before CJM Jaunpur, next hearing Aug 10, 2026
Amounts converted from ₹million to ₹crore (1 crore = 10 million = 100 lakh). Only the tax sub-tables [p537 Company, p539 Promoter] give explicit aggregate amounts (₹99.79M and ₹0.06M respectively, total ₹9.985 crore); civil/criminal matters are listed individually with no aggregate. Company: 5 criminal matters (4 Section 138 NI Act complaints 37/2024, 40/2024, 41/2024, 42/2024 against M/s Rakesh Kumar, plus FIR 0234/2025 against Papton Timbers for ₹1.61M fraudulent misappropriation) — all by Company, 0 against; 8 material civil matters (WP 34903/21, WP 34905/21, Arbitration 02/2021, WP 2463/2026, WP 2359/2026, WP 2464/2026, CWJC 6702/2026, CWJC 4742/2026) — all by Company, 0 against; 8 tax matters against + 6 tax matters by Company = 14 total tax. Promoters: 3 criminal FIRs against (393/2023 fatal, 513/2023, 191/2021 — all Jaunpur sewer-line work); 1 direct-tax demand of ₹0.06M against (Mrs. Rekha Tyagi, AY 2008-09, rectification pending). Directors (other than promoters): all categories Nil — the 3 criminal cases involving Managing Director Sanjay Tyagi are already counted under Promoters. KMP/SMP: no separate proceedings beyond the 3 promoter FIRs referenced. Subsidiaries: none. Group Companies: no material litigation. GST-related writ petitions (WP 10144/2025, 7862/2025, 7962/2025, 11423/2025, 1999/2026) collectively involve ~₹131M + ₹115.83M + ₹104.88M paid through GSTR-3B and ~₹36.98M deposited under protest per petition; specific amount not stated as aggregate.. Outstanding means unresolved — a listed case is an exposure, not a verdict.
What the issuer and the exchanges published. Everything else on this tab is read out of these.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.
Which institutions were allotted shares before bidding opened, and how many.
Where physical applications could be submitted.
The issuer's own "basis of issue price": the earnings multiples it is asking for, and the peer companies it chose to compare itself against.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.