Borosil Scientific Q2 FY26: standalone revenue up 14% YoY, consolidated PAT turns negative

Revenue DeclinePat NegativeExceptional ItemResults View source PDF Explain this filing

BOROSCI · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

+0.8%Reaction day

₹132.00

prior close

₹132.00

announcement price

After-mkt

timing

Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used+0.4%+0.4% vs market

Industrial Products peers, median of 312sector · industry level+0.0%+0.8% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 0.4 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 0.8 pts more than its Industrial Products peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

-0.0

10m

-0.1

15m

-0.5

30m

-0.6

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

+0.8+0.4+0.4+0.0+0.8

Next day

+0.7+0.0+0.7-0.0+0.8

-3.0-0.2-2.8+0.0-3.0

-2.3+0.7-3.0+0.0-2.3

-1.5+0.6-2.1-0.6-0.9

-5.7+0.5-6.2-0.6-5.0

+1.9+0.3+1.6-1.5+3.4

15d

-3.1-1.5-1.7-3.0-0.1

-7.7-6.6-1.2-6.8-0.9

-6.3-3.2-3.1-5.9-0.4

-20.0-5.2-14.8-8.2-11.7

UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Industrial Products peers, median of 312Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Borosil Scientific reported Q2 FY26 standalone revenue of Rs 99.5 crore (up 13.8% YoY) with PAT of Rs 7.5 crore. H1 standalone PAT fell 43.6% YoY to Rs 8 crore due to a Rs 6.6 crore one-time VRS charge at the Nashik plant. Consolidated H1 revenue declined 2.3% YoY and the company swung to a consolidated loss of Rs 1.4 crore, largely dragged by subsidiary Goel Scientific Glass Works which posted a Rs 9.1 crore loss in H1.

Likely market impact

Consolidated results weakened on subsidiary drag and one-time VRS cost; standalone operations stayed profitable with steady revenue growth.