BSECHL Ltd· Leisure ServicesHighNegative
Announced Wed, 17 Sept, 2025 · 11:59 IST

In reference to the Writ petition 17113/2004 Hon''ble High Court of Delhi Vide order dated 12.09.2025 disposed of the said writ petition in which Company challenges the notification issued ....

Litigation LossRegulatory & Legal View source PDFExplain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-4.0%Reaction day
₹36.75
prior close
₹35.15
announcement price
In-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used+0.6%-4.7% vs market
Hotels & Resorts peers, median of 53sector-0.2%-3.8% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 4.7 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 3.8 pts less than its Hotels & Resorts peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
+0.0
10m
+0.0
15m
+0.0
30m
+0.0
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-4.0+0.6-4.7-0.2-3.8
Next day
-2.0+0.4-2.4-0.1-1.9
2d
-2.1+0.8-2.8-0.6-1.4
3d
-5.8+0.0-5.8-1.2-4.6
4d
-2.3-0.3-2.0-0.9-1.4
5d
+1.8-0.6+2.4-2.4+4.1
1w
-4.6-3.8-0.8-2.9-1.7
15d
+2.0-2.9+5.0-3.1+5.1
1m
+1.8-2.9+4.7-5.4+7.2
2m
-0.7-1.5+0.8-8.9+8.2
3m
-7.5-8.1+0.5-13.9+6.4
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Hotels & Resorts peers, median of 53Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

CHL Ltd informed the stock exchange that the Delhi High Court has dismissed its writ petition (No. 17113/2004) by passing an order against the company on 12 September 2025. The petition challenged a notification under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, which imposed differential property tax on hotels by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). The company is now assessing the financial impact of this ruling. The matter dates back to 2004, making it a long-pending dispute. No promoter or related party has any interest in the matter.

Likely market impact

Negative outcome for shareholders — the company has lost its legal challenge against the differential property tax, which could result in additional tax liability. However, the exact financial impact is still being assessed, so the magnitude is not yet clear.