CROMPTONNSECrompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited· Consumer DurablesHighNegative
Announced Tue, 16 Jun, 2026 · 19:44 IST

Crompton Greaves: GST appeal order upheld against company, ₹3.33 cr demand

Litigation LossRegulatory & Legal View source PDFExplain this filing

CROMPTON · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
+4.3%Reaction day
₹264.65
prior close
₹266.00
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty Smallcap 250market+0.7%+3.6% vs market
Household Appliances peers, median of 23sector+0.6%+3.7% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 3.6 pts more than Nifty Smallcap 250 and 3.7 pts more than its Household Appliances peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
+0.5
10m
+1.3
15m
+2.2
30m
+2.4
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
+4.3+0.7+3.6+0.6+3.7
Next day
+4.7+1.4+3.3+1.4+3.3
2d
+4.3+2.0+2.3+1.4+2.9
3d
+4.6+2.8+1.8+1.6+3.0
4d
+2.7+2.2+0.5+0.6+2.1
5d
+4.0+2.4+1.6+0.9+3.1
1w
+3.2+1.4+1.7+0.0+3.1
15d
-2.0+2.9-5.0-0.4-1.7
1m
-3.3+3.7-6.9+0.3-3.6
2m
-6.9+5.4-12.3+1.6-8.4
3m
-14.3+3.7-18.0-6.4-7.9
UpDownMarket · Nifty Smallcap 250Sector · Household Appliances peers, median of 23Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Crompton Greaves received an order from the Commissioner (Appeals) under SGST Act for FY 2019-20, upholding a demand of ₹3.33 crore (tax ₹1.50 cr + interest ₹1.68 cr + penalty ₹15 lakh). The demand relates to alleged excess ITC claims, short tax payment vs E-waybill records, and ineligible ITC. The company says no material financial impact and plans to appeal further under Section 112 of SGST Act.

Likely market impact

Minor tax demand of ₹3.33 cr; company lost at appellate level but plans further appeal, no material impact stated