BM OUTCOME

Net loss reportedExceptional itemEBITDA margin compressionResults View source PDF Explain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

—Next day

₹13.69

prior close

—

announcement price

After-mkt

timing

Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used-0.2%—

Trading & Distributors peers, median of 131sector-1.2%—

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

—

10m

—

15m

—

30m

—

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

—+0.6—-0.8—

Next day

—-0.2—-1.2—

—-0.4—-2.0—

+0.0-0.7+0.7-2.4+2.4

-17.0-2.2-14.8-2.6-14.4

-17.0-2.8-14.2-4.2-12.8

—-1.4—-3.2—

15d

-26.6-7.0-19.6-7.0-19.6

—-6.1—-6.7—

—-9.2—-11.9—

—-6.8—-12.6—

UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Trading & Distributors peers, median of 131Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

The board of Diggi Multitrade approved unaudited standalone financial results for the half year ended 30 September 2025. Revenue from operations stood at Rs. 11.50 lakhs, compared with nil in the same half of the previous year and Rs. 205.99 lakhs for the full year ended March 2025. The company reported a net loss of Rs. 12.71 lakhs, wider than the Rs. 2.66 lakh loss in H1 FY25, with EPS of negative Rs. 0.13. The results include an exceptional item of Rs. 4 lakhs for bad debts written off. Trade receivables remain unusually high at Rs. 372.82 lakhs against this small revenue base, and reserves and surplus have dropped to Rs. 39.75 lakhs from Rs. 52.46 lakhs.

Likely market impact

Widening losses on a very small revenue base, along with bloated trade receivables and shrinking reserves, signal continued financial weakness and may weigh on the stock. The company also confirmed that related-party transaction disclosure rules do not apply to it due to its small size.