GUJGASLTDNSEGujarat Gas Limited· GasHighNeutral
Announced Tue, 20 Jan, 2026 · 14:32 IST

Q3 FY26 Results: Revenue Down, Net Profit Up Nearly 20 Percent

GUJGASLTD · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-3.7%Reaction day
₹407.30
prior close
₹403.80
announcement price
In-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used-2.7%-1.0% vs market
LPG/CNG/PNG/LNG Supplier peers, median of 6sector-2.2%-1.5% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 1.0 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 1.5 pts less than its LPG/CNG/PNG/LNG Supplier peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
-1.5
10m
-1.4
15m
-1.9
30m
-2.1
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-3.7-2.7-1.0-2.2-1.5
Next day
-1.7-3.5+1.8-2.5+0.8
2d
-0.1-2.0+1.9-0.8+0.7
3d
-0.6-4.1+3.5-3.2+2.7
4d
-0.8-3.9+3.2-4.0+3.2
5d
+1.2-2.0+3.1-2.5+3.6
1w
+4.3-0.6+4.9-2.4+6.8
15d
+5.6+4.4+1.1+1.9+3.7
1m
-0.5+1.3-1.8-4.8+4.3
2m
-13.2-6.9-6.3-10.1-3.0
3m
-9.8+4.6-14.5+0.6-10.5
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · LPG/CNG/PNG/LNG Supplier peers, median of 6Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Gujarat Gas posted Q3 FY26 standalone revenue from operations of Rs 3,865.11 cr, down 10.8 percent from Rs 4,332.51 cr a year ago. Nine month revenue fell 7.6 percent to Rs 11,909.44 cr versus Rs 12,895.99 cr. Despite lower sales, Q3 net profit rose nearly 20 percent to Rs 265.58 cr from Rs 221.62 cr. Nine month PAT grew modestly to Rs 873.36 cr. Q3 EPS stood at Rs 3.86 versus Rs 3.22. Auditor issued an unmodified review report.

Likely market impact

Profit grew faster than revenue, signalling improved margins despite weaker top line. Better cost efficiency is a positive for shareholders near term.