शुभ दीपावलीDiwali offer: 3 months free on yearly plans · ends 11 NovSee plans
JAGRANNSEJagran Prakashan Limited· MediaHighNeutral
Announced Thu, 25 Sept, 2025 · 20:00 IST

Jagran Prakashan Limited has informed the Exchange about General Updates regarding regulation 30 of the Listing Regulations

JAGRAN · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-0.4%Reaction day
₹71.10
prior close
₹71.00
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used-2.1%+1.7% vs market
Print Media peers, median of 5sector+0.6%-1.0% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 1.7 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 1.0 pts less than its Print Media peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
+0.2
10m
+0.3
15m
+0.2
30m
+0.2
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-0.4-2.1+1.7+0.6-1.0
Next day
-0.6-2.9+2.4-1.6+1.1
2d
+1.5-3.3+4.8-0.7+2.2
3d
+0.8-2.0+2.8+0.7+0.2
4d
+1.9-0.7+2.6——
5d
+1.6-1.0+2.6-0.9+2.5
1w
+1.3-1.5+2.8-1.2+2.5
15d
+0.1-0.3+0.4-2.0+2.1
1m
+3.3+0.3+3.0+0.5+2.8
2m
-1.5-1.8+0.3——
3m
+0.3-5.3+5.6-9.7+10.1
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Print Media peers, median of 5Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Jagran Prakashan informed the exchanges about the latest hearing in an ongoing NCLT Allahabad case — 'Mahendra Mohan Gupta & Ors. v. Devendra Mohan Gupta & Ors.' — which is a family/internal corporate dispute filed under Sections 241, 242 and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013 (oppression and mismanagement). On 24 September 2025, the NCLT noted that earlier settlement talks between the parties had failed and heard final arguments from the respondents' side. JPL itself had filed an application (CA No. 47/2023) seeking appointment of an Administrator for the company, which the Tribunal did not allow to be argued alongside but kept pending. High-profile senior counsels (Singhvi, Chidambaram, Jethmalani, Mehta) are representing various sides. Further arguments are scheduled for 26 September 2025 at 3:00 p.m.

Likely market impact

The dispute is an internal shareholder/family conflict at the promoter level and could potentially affect management control of the company if the Tribunal eventually grants interim management relief. For now, the case is ongoing with no order against the company, but the failure of settlement talks keeps governance uncertainty alive in the near term.