Disclosure pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015

Litigation LossRegulatory & Legal View source PDF Explain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

+1.7%Reaction day

₹2.33

prior close

—

announcement price

After-mkt

timing

Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used+0.3%+1.4% vs market

Gems, Jewellery And Watches peers, median of 32sector+0.0%+1.7% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 1.4 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 1.7 pts more than its Gems, Jewellery And Watches peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

—

10m

—

15m

—

30m

—

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

+1.7+0.3+1.4+0.0+1.7

Next day

+3.4-0.2+3.7+0.6+2.9

+5.2-0.4+5.6-0.1+5.2

+6.9-0.4+7.3-0.8+7.7

+8.6-0.7+9.3-0.7+9.3

+10.7-1.0+11.7-1.2+11.9

+18.5-4.0+22.5-2.5+21.0

15d

+17.2-5.7+22.9-6.8+24.0

+8.2-5.0+13.1-4.6+12.7

+11.6-1.8+13.4-5.5+17.1

+6.0-5.3+11.3-6.7+12.7

UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Gems, Jewellery And Watches peers, median of 32Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Meyer Apparel Ltd (formerly GIVO Ltd) has disclosed a material litigation under SEBI LODR Regulation 30. A Civil Judge in Gurugram passed an order on 14th July 2025 directing the attachment of the 'GIVO' trademark and certain assets of the company, in a case filed by M/s Orange Overseas Private Limited. The financial amount involved is Rs. 33.47 Lakhs. The company has stated that the 'GIVO' trademark does not belong to it and is undertaking appropriate legal action to challenge the order.

Likely market impact

This is an adverse court order that could affect the company's brand identity and a portion of its assets, though the monetary value is relatively small. The stock may see negative sentiment as the matter is contested and remains unresolved.