The Exchange has received the disclosure under Regulation 29(2) of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 for Yogakshem Sansthan

Ownership Changes View source PDF Explain this filing

PATANJALI · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

+0.1%Reaction day

₹557.50

prior close

₹561.10

announcement price

In-mkt

timing

Nifty Midcap 150market · index membership as recorded later (tracked since Jun 2026)+0.7%-0.6% vs market

Edible Oil peers, median of 20sector+0.8%-0.7% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 0.6 pts less than Nifty Midcap 150 and 0.7 pts less than its Edible Oil peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

+0.0

10m

-0.2

15m

-0.1

30m

-0.4

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

+0.1+0.7-0.6+0.8-0.7

Next day

+2.0+1.7+0.3+0.2+1.8

+1.5+2.7-1.2+1.1+0.4

+1.0+2.7-1.8+0.8+0.1

+0.2+2.4-2.2+1.2-1.0

-0.0+0.8-0.9+1.2-1.2

+0.2+1.2-1.0+1.8-1.6

15d

-1.5+2.0-3.4+2.1-3.6

-1.3+2.7-4.1+3.0-4.4

+9.3-0.2+9.5+2.4+6.9

+6.8-0.8+7.6+3.1+3.7

UpDownMarket · Nifty Midcap 150Sector · Edible Oil peers, median of 20Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Yogakshem Sansthan, part of the promoter group of Patanjali Foods, sold 13 lakh shares (0.35% of total share capital) through a disclosure filed under SEBI's takeover regulations. The promoter group's holding fell from 69.45% to 69.09% after this transaction. No encumbered shares (pledges) are involved in this sale. The disclosure lists 20 persons acting in concert, including Acharya Balkrishna and various Patanjali group entities and trusts.

Likely market impact

The sale is small in size and promoter holding remains comfortably above 50%, so the impact on shareholder structure is minimal. Retail investors should note continued gradual trimming by the promoter group, though the controlling stake is firmly intact.