TIJARIANSETijaria Polypipes Limited· Industrial ProductsHighNegative
Announced Wed, 25 Mar, 2026 · 17:21 IST

Tijaria Polypipes Limited has informed regarding Disclosure of material issue

Litigation LossSebi InvestigationRegulatory & Legal View source PDFExplain this filing

TIJARIA · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-7.0%Reaction day
₹4.60
prior close
₹4.41
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used-2.8%-4.1% vs market
Plastic Products - Industrial peers, median of 40sector-3.2%-3.8% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 4.1 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 3.8 pts less than its Plastic Products - Industrial peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
-0.5
10m
-0.5
15m
-0.5
30m
-0.5
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-7.0-2.8-4.1-3.2-3.8
Next day
-11.5-5.6-5.9-7.7-3.8
2d
-12.4-1.3-11.1-1.8-10.6
3d
-12.0-0.6-11.4+0.1-12.1
4d
-7.8+0.4-8.3+0.4-8.2
5d
-4.3+0.8-5.1+1.2-5.6
1w
+0.0+4.9-4.9+5.1-5.1
15d
+0.0+14.4-14.4+10.1-10.1
1m
+0.2+15.3-15.1+9.2-9.0
2m
-2.0+18.8-20.8+11.7-13.6
3m
-5.2+24.3-29.5+10.8-16.0
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Plastic Products - Industrial peers, median of 40Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Tijaria Polypipes Limited has disclosed a court order received from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur, Rajasthan, under SEBI's Regulation 30 (LODR). The matter relates to case CIS-444/2015 and concerns allegations that the company failed to disclose certain Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) of around ₹2.5 crore taken from parties such as Nihita Financial Services, Marine Gems, Sanjivani Gems, Bellisima Impex, and Balasaria Holdings prior to its September 2011 IPO prospectus. The order also references Sections 63, 68, 141, and 628 of the Companies Act, 1956, dealing with false or misleading statements in a prospectus and vicarious liability of directors. The company has shared the full order copy with stock exchanges as a material disclosure.

Likely market impact

This is a negative development for shareholders, as it signals an ongoing criminal court proceeding against the company and its directors over alleged non-disclosure of pre-IPO borrowings, which could harm investor confidence and the stock's reputation. The actual financial or penal outcome is not yet clear from the disclosure, but the headline alone may weigh on the stock price.