ULTRACEMCONSEUltraTech Cement Limited· Cement & Cement ProductsHighNegative
Announced Thu, 28 Aug, 2025 · 19:06 IST

UltraTech Cement Limited has informed the Exchange about Action(s) taken or orders passed

ULTRACEMCO · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
+0.6%Reaction day
₹12555.00
prior close
₹12521.00
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty 100market · index membership as recorded later (tracked since Jun 2026)-0.3%+0.9% vs market
Cement & Cement Products peers, median of 36sector+0.3%+0.4% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 0.9 pts more than Nifty 100 and 0.4 pts more than its Cement & Cement Products peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
+0.4
10m
+0.8
15m
+0.8
30m
+0.6
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
+0.6-0.3+0.9+0.3+0.4
Next day
+1.8+0.6+1.2+1.9-0.1
2d
+1.4+0.5+0.8+2.6-1.2
3d
+1.2+1.1+0.1+3.8-2.7
4d
+0.7+1.1-0.4+2.8-2.0
5d
+0.3+1.1-0.8+2.1-1.8
1w
+0.1+1.6-1.6+1.5-1.5
15d
-0.4+3.8-4.1+2.5-2.9
1m
-4.1+0.9-5.0-2.7-1.4
2m
-4.4+6.4-10.7-5.2+0.8
3m
-4.3+6.5-10.9-11.7+7.4
UpDownMarket · Nifty 100Sector · Cement & Cement Products peers, median of 36Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

UltraTech Cement has received an order from the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), GST & Central Excise, Rajkot, in connection with a prior GST demand of Rs. 14,63,754 (plus interest and equivalent penalty) raised by the Superintendent in Amreli, Gujarat. The appellate authority has set aside the original demand raised under Section 74 of the CGST Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 73, which is a comparatively milder provision. The underlying allegation relates to ineligible input tax credit (ITC) claimed on invoices from a vendor who did not file GSTR-3B or remit tax. The company has stated there is no material financial impact from this order.

Likely market impact

This is a partial relief for UltraTech — the original GST demand has been quashed at the appellate level, though the matter has been sent back for re-examination. Since Section 73 generally carries lower penalties and a shorter limitation period than Section 74, the outcome is broadly favourable for shareholders with no material financial impact disclosed.