BSEUnishire Urban Infra Ltd· RealtyHighNegative
Announced Wed, 26 Nov, 2025 · 19:16 IST

Submission of Court Order- Money Suit No. 530 of 2018

Litigation LossRegulatory & Legal View source PDFExplain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
+4.9%Reaction day
₹1.83
prior close
—
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used-0.4%+5.4% vs market
Residential, Commercial Projects peers, median of 53sector-0.4%+5.3% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 5.4 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 5.3 pts more than its Residential, Commercial Projects peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
—
10m
—
15m
—
30m
—
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
+4.9-0.4+5.4-0.4+5.3
Next day
+4.4-0.5+4.9-0.2+4.6
2d
+6.0-0.7+6.7-1.2+7.2
3d
—-1.3—-1.6—
4d
+2.2-1.8+4.0-0.5+2.7
5d
+1.6-2.3+4.0-0.9+2.6
1w
-1.1-5.7+4.6-2.1+1.0
15d
+6.6-5.1+11.6-1.6+8.1
1m
-2.7-4.3+1.6-1.2-1.6
2m
-7.1-11.6+4.5-7.2+0.1
3m
-12.0-8.4-3.7-5.5-6.5
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Residential, Commercial Projects peers, median of 53Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Unishire Urban Infra Ltd has disclosed to BSE the court order in Money Suit No. 530 of 2018, decided by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), 10th Court, Alipore, on June 30, 2025. The suit was filed by Jaiswal Akash & Co, a Chartered Accountants firm, alleging that the company wrongly used their firm name and Firm Registration Number as its internal auditor for FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18 in filings with the Registrar of Companies and BSE, without ever appointing or taking consent from the plaintiff. The court ruled against the company, noting admissions from the company's witness that the plaintiff's name was indeed filed with ROC and BSE as internal auditor without consent, and that no compensation was paid. While the plaintiff claimed Rs. 10 lakh in damages, the court found no strong evidence of business loss and awarded only Rs. 1 lakh as nominal damages, payable within 90 days, with no order on costs.

Likely market impact

Minor negative for shareholders — the company has lost a civil suit and must pay Rs. 1 lakh in damages within 90 days, but the financial impact is negligible. However, the ruling confirms that the company filed incorrect information about its internal auditor with ROC and BSE, which raises corporate governance and disclosure quality concerns.