SRG Housing Finance Q2 FY26 earnings call
In brief
SRG Housing Q2 loan book up 33% YoY to INR867 cr; targets INR1,500 cr AUM by 2028, A- rating at INR1,000 cr AUM.
- Management's tone
- Confident
- What was said
- Leaned positive
- Guidance
- Guidance held
- Analyst pushback
- Medium
- Stock, next session
- −0.97% (Nifty 50 +0.12%)
- Loan book grew 33.21% YoY to INR867 cr; Q2 PAT up 25% YoY at INR8 cr on 32% income growth.
- FY26 AUM target cut to INR970 cr from INR1,000-1,100 cr; management cites NHB curb on LAP portion.
- AUM INR1,500 cr target moved to 2028 from earlier FY27; Q3 and Q4 disbursement guided at INR150 cr each.
- A- rating upgrade tied to AUM crossing INR1,000 cr; current rating moved from BBB+ stable to BBB+ positive.
- Cost-to-income expected to fall 2-3% as expansion phase ends; branches to reach 100 by year-end from 93.
An AI read of the company's transcript · the filing
The numbers
The quarter, Q2 FY26
| This quarter | A year ago | Last quarter | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹47.8 cr | +32.6% | +14.6% | |
| Profit before tax | ₹10.3 cr | +23.8% | +31.4% | 21.6% (23.1% a year ago) |
| Net profit | ₹8.3 cr | +24.9% | +21.7% | 17.3% (18.3% a year ago) |
| EPS (₹) | ₹5.26 | +8.0% | +21.5% |
From the company's filed results for the quarter ended 30 Sept 2025 (standalone), not from the call.
What moved the numbers, as management explained it
- Loan book growth: 33.21% YoY to INR867 cr from INR651 cr; AUM per branch ~INR9.3 cr currently vs target INR20-25 cr.
- Q2 disbursement at INR117 cr vs INR63 cr (+85% YoY) drove AUM growth; Q3-Q4 guided at INR150 cr each.
- NHB-mandated 70-30 housing-to-LAP mix shift compressed yields; yield to settle around 9-9.5% from earlier ~11%.
- Borrowing cost declined to 10.99% from 11.03% YoY; INR50 cr mutual fund NCD raised in Q2.
- Income up 32% to INR48 cr; PAT up 25% to INR8 cr with net worth up 38% to INR279 cr post fundraise.
The numbers management led with
- Outstanding borrowings: INR685 cr (vs INR542 cr in prior quarter)
- NCD issuance (Q2 FY26): INR50 cr NCD issued; INR50 cr subscribed by mutual fund (first such subscription)
- AUM per branch (target): INR20-25 cr per branch at maturity (vs INR8-9 cr currently)
- Rating outlook: Upgraded from BBB+ stable to BBB+ positive
Guidance
Guidance on this call
| What | For | What management said |
|---|---|---|
| FY26 AUM target | FY26 | FY26 AUM target INR970 cr. |
| Long-term AUM target | FY28 | AUM target INR1,500 cr by 2028. |
| FY26 disbursement target | FY26 | FY26 disbursement target INR400 cr. |
| Q3 FY26 disbursement target | Q3 FY26 | Q3 FY26 disbursement target INR150 cr. |
| Q4 FY26 disbursement target | Q4 FY26 | Q4 FY26 disbursement target INR150 cr. |
| Branches by year-end | FY26 | Branches to reach 100 by year-end from 93. |
| A- rating trigger | FY27 | A- rating expected as AUM crosses INR1,000 cr. |
| AUM per branch target | FY28 | AUM per branch target INR20-25 cr. |
| Total book size aspiration | FY28 | Book size target INR2,000-2,500 cr at 100 branches. |
| Yield guidance | FY26 | Yield to settle around 9-9.5% (currently 9.67%). |
| Cost-to-income reduction | FY26 | Cost-to-income to reduce by 2-3% in coming quarters. |
What changed since the Mon 5 May 2025 call
| What | On the Mon 5 May 2025 call | On this call |
|---|---|---|
| FY26 AUM target (cut) | FY26 AUM target INR1,000-1,100 cr. | FY26 AUM target INR970 cr. |
| AUM INR1,500 cr timing (restated) | FY27 AUM target ~INR1,500 cr. | AUM INR1,500 cr to be reached by 2028. |
| Branch count (raised) | Hold branches at 90 until AUM crosses INR1,000 cr. | Branches at 93, target 100 by year-end. |
| Credit rating outlook (achieved) | Rating BBB+ stable; A- expected once AUM crosses INR1,000 cr. | Rating upgraded to BBB+ positive; A- still tied to AUM crossing INR1,000 cr. |
| Loan mix and yield (restated) | Average housing loan yield 18%, LAP yield ~20%; no rate cut planned. | HL rate 16-18% as LAP portion cut to 30% by NHB; yield to settle at 9-9.5%. |
| AUM level (achieved) | FY25 AUM at INR759 cr. | Loan book at INR867 cr (+33.21% YoY). |
The business
By business
Housing Finance
Loan book at INR867 cr (+33.21% YoY); GNPA 1.88%, NNPA 0.64%; new states Maharashtra, AP, Karnataka added; rating upgraded to BBB+ positive.
Loan book INR867 cr · Loan book growth 33.21% YoY · Q2 disbursement INR117 cr · Q2 disbursement growth 85% YoY · Income INR48 cr (+32% YoY) · PAT INR8 cr (+25% YoY) · Net worth INR279 cr (+38% YoY) · GNPA 1.88% · NNPA 0.64% · Borrowing cost 10.99% · Credit cost 1.66% · Lending rate 20% · Spread 9% · CRAR 42.68% · Branches 93
Outlook: AUM INR970 cr in FY26, INR1,500 cr by 2028; A- rating expected as AUM crosses INR1,000 cr; cost-to-income to fall 2-3% in coming quarters.
Balance sheet, capex and funding
- Borrowings; Total borrowings INR685 cr (banks 45%, NHB 4%, NCD 7%, financial institutions 44%); INR50 cr NCD issued in Q2, INR26 cr in current quarter.
- Liquidity; Liquid fund INR132 cr with INR70 cr undrawn sanctions.
- Capital adequacy; CRAR 42.68%; net worth INR279 cr (+38% YoY); no further fundraise needed till AUM INR1,500-2,000 cr.
- Asset quality; GNPA 1.88% (vs 1.96% YoY), NNPA 0.64% (vs 0.59%); 1+ DPD 12%, 30+ DPD 7.32%.
- Credit cost; Credit cost 1.66% in Q2 FY26 vs 1.81% in Q2 FY25.
- Branch expansion; Branches at 93, target 100 by year-end; no further expansion for 2-3 years.
The industry, as management sees it
Management views the NBFC/HFC sector as structurally large given only 3-4% of Indians file regular income tax returns and the remaining 96% need credit access. The NHB-mandated 70:30 HL-LAP mix is compressing sector yields, and any stress in adjacent verticals (microfinance, unsecured) keeps bank lending rates elevated across the industry. Long-term sustainable growth in housing finance is the call.
Risks management named
- NHB-mandated reduction in LAP portion is compressing overall yields
- Industry-wide microfinance stress could keep bank lending rates elevated
- Early-bucket DPD uptick (0-30 DPD at 4.65% vs 4.10% prior quarter)
- Reliance on multiple-state presence to win rating agency confidence
Q&A
Discussion was dominated by growth trajectory questions (loan book, disbursement guidance, AUM targets), rating upgrade path to category A, geographic diversification beyond Rajasthan, and DPD bucket analysis. The most pointed pushback came from Aditya and Harshil on the early-bucket DPD creep (0-30 up to 4.65% from 4.10%) and on the apparent reduction in AUM growth guidance, which management attributed to NHB's LAP cap rather than demand weakness. Ankit Kanodia's exchanges on equity dilution timing and industry competition were the most candid — management firmly refused to time equity raises to share price. The chat-driven questions on borrowing cost post-fundraise and branch strategy in Rajasthan were effectively deflected with structural arguments.
Not answered directly
- Cost-to-income reaching 55-60%
- Exact AUM target date to reach INR1,500 cr (later clarified to 2028)
- Reason for early-bucket DPD increase — called it normal noise
Asked for a number, answered without one
- GNPA/NNPA target by year-end: Said rural sector sees only 1% up-and-down movement; expects around current level, no specific number given.
- Cost-to-income below 60%: Said cost-to-income will fall by 2-5% over 2-3 quarters but did not commit to a specific level.
- A- rating timeline and criteria: Said A- rating tied to AUM crossing INR1,000 cr; no specific timeline beyond that threshold given.
Every question, with its answer
1. Cost-to-income and NIM outlook
Moderator (Kaptify Consulting), Kaptify Consulting
Question. Cost-to-income ratio has been elevated and profit was stuck below a threshold; this quarter profit crossed INR8 cr. What is the vision and growth strategy, and how will NIMs and cost-to-income ratio play out over the next 2-3 quarters?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. The company was in an expansion phase for the past 2 years, so expenses were high. As the business grows, the cost-to-income ratio is starting to decrease. Senior manpower has been settled. Costing will not grow and will decrease day by day. By reducing cost-to-income by 2-3%, we can reach around 62%. PBT is around 22% and NIM is around 9% — tightness from NHB regulations has kept NIM slightly lower than otherwise.
Partly answered.
2. Future equity dilution
Ankit Kanodia, Unknown
Question. The company recently did a fundraise. Over the next 2-3 years, do you think you will need any other fundraise given the growth ambitions?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. In a finance company, as the loan book and AUM increase, leverage ratios matter. NHB allows leverage up to 12x but banks don't lend above 5x; at 3-4x leverage we would need equity. With current equity levels, no further fundraise is needed until AUM reaches INR1,500-2,000 cr. We will raise only when needed.
Follow-up. Sometimes when you need funds the market is bad and prices are low. Will you time the raise in advance when the share price is good, or wait until needed?
Answer. Diluting equity before it is needed makes it difficult to run the company. Our focus is not on share market rates — when the company needs funds we will raise them. The share market will be there as long as the company is there.
3. Regulatory environment and NBFC outlook
Ankit Kanodia, Unknown
Question. From a regulatory perspective, there is a general sense that the regulator is encouraging NBFCs. Do you agree, and will the NBFC market be big enough to absorb many more players entering?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. In India, only 3-4% of people file regular income tax returns — for them there are big banks. The remaining 96% still need access, so even 2-5% more penetration would need many finance companies and banks. The NBFC vertical will keep running as long as the country runs.
Follow-up. What is the biggest risk for the company in the next 1.5-2 years that you are preparing for?
Answer. Discipline. In finance you should run with discipline and not take shortcuts. Housing finance takes long-term money — we do not take short-term money or do bullet payments. If we run with discipline we will run for a long time.
4. Balance transfer dynamics
Ankit Kanodia, Unknown
Question. What is the status of balance transfers for the company and how do you see them in the next 1-2 years?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Balance transfer is a practice we consider wrong but it is the best practice of the industry. Where a customer gets less rate they will do a balance transfer. If we do 10-12% balance transfer, then 20% comes to us from other companies. This will continue. New clients will come and go — it is a process.
5. Disbursement and AUM guidance
Rohitash Arora, Unknown
Question. This quarter disbursement was INR116 cr. What is the guidance for Q3 and Q4 disbursements, and by when can we reach the INR1,500 cr AUM?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Disbursement target is INR150 cr each in Q3 and Q4. INR1,500 cr AUM can be reached by 2028 — not three years, but one to two years from now.
Follow-up. Will the loan mix between housing loan and LAP be maintained?
Answer. Yes, as per NHB guidelines — 70:30 housing-loan-to-LAP. The balance sheet is 60% housing and the rest is 70:30 mix.
6. AUM per branch and branch expansion
Suyash Bhave, Unknown
Question. With 93 branches and AUM per branch between INR8-9 cr for many quarters, what is the peak AUM per branch assuming we have all the funding?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. The target is to make AUM around INR25 cr per branch since each branch covers 50-60 km. Branch count will not increase for 2-3 years except for 5-7 more in existing states. With INR20-25 cr per branch average, the book will be around INR2,000-2,500 cr.
Follow-up. When will cost-to-income go below 60% or around 55%? Any guidance?
Answer. If expansion stops, costing will gradually go down. We cannot commit because as the book increases, manpower cost and expenses also increase. It will fall around 2-5% and take 2-3 quarters.
Not answered directly.
7. New geographic expansion
Harshil Bhayani, Unknown
Question. On the new expansion in Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, what kind of environment are you seeing — competitive, credit-wise — and how does it differ from core Rajasthan? What are the positives and negatives?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Karnataka has better development; property quality is good, more educated customers, more decisions and fewer discussions. In the last 6 months we built a book of INR34 cr in Maharashtra, INR20 cr in Andhra Pradesh and INR18 cr in Karnataka. Ticket sizes are higher — average INR20-25 lakhs. All three states gave good results.
Follow-up. What is the competition there, and do you have to compromise on lending rate for growth?
Answer. Earlier we had higher LAP percentage; now we focus on housing loans at 16-18%. The rate has fallen a bit but you have to move with the times.
8. Branch breakeven and DPD
Harshil Bhayani, Unknown
Question. What is the breakeven for branches in these 3 states, and how are the initial DPDs in Karnataka and AP and overall?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. DPDs are not that high in new states — only 5-10 cases. Overall 1+ DPD is around 12% and 30+ DPD is 7.32%.
Follow-up. What insights are you getting from the digital platform Srajan — what percentage of new enquiries comes from the app?
Answer. We work 100% on the digital platform. Agreements and all processes run digitally. Signups and all come through the platform. Digital is beneficial and work is fast.
Partly answered.
9. Yield guidance
Harshil Bhayani, Unknown
Question. Yield has come down to 9.7% from 11% earlier. Is that because of the 70:30 HL-LAP guideline? How are you looking at yield going forward — single digit or double digit?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Yes, the mix change is the reason. Housing loan rate is lower than LAP rate; reducing the LAP portion brings the rate difference. Branch AUM will increase, portfolio will increase, so even at lower rate profit will be good and costing will be less. The combination of repo rate benefit, costing benefit and rating upgrade runs together. Yield will be around 9 to 9.5% — currently 9.67% and expected around 9.5%.
10. Microfinance overlap and underwriting changes
Kaushal Mehta, Unknown
Question. You work more in the rural sector — how much overlap do you have with the microfinance sector, and what changes have you made to credit underwriting models?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Microfinance is completely different — it is unsecured while we do secured housing loans. When we do loans we look at CIBIL and everything. If a person takes microfinance separately, we cannot stop it. On underwriting, the process is the same as before but we have made it auto-mode using geotagging and video calls for faster decisions. Rajasthan is good and there is no problem there.
Partly answered.
11. Sector outlook and H2 guidance
Aditya A, Unknown
Question. Larger affordable housing companies reported lower disbursement growth and higher DPDs this quarter. Do you think there is a slowdown in the sector and what is your H2 outlook for AUM growth and asset quality? Can we expect improvement in GNPA and NNPA by year end?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Affordable housing loans given are not bad — growth has been up and down for the last 3-4 years and it could come back. For asset quality, we don't do loans far from the city because the customer may not live there and default. We follow 50% LTV, so 50% of the customer's own money is required. There is no stress in the market. We can expect improvement in GNPA and NNPA by year end.
Partly answered.
12. Rating upgrade path and benefits
Vishal Mehta, Unknown
Question. At BBB+ positive with cost of funding close to 11%, how much time will it take to reach category A, and what criteria do rating agencies look at? Would terms improve materially after an A rating?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. As soon as AUM exceeds INR1,000 cr we will go to category A rating. Rating agencies also look at the financial industry — when there is stress anywhere (microfinance, unsecured, etc.) banks don't reduce their rates. After the mutual fund came in, NCDs started coming and housing finance tenure of 5+ years is now available. After A rating, the bank's risk weight on us will come down from 150% to 75% or 50%, which means we will get loans more easily and at better rates.
13. Borrowing cost post fundraise
Moderator (chat - Anand Mundra), Unknown
Question. Why has our borrowing cost not reduced after the fund raise?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Fund raise and borrowing cost are two different things. After a fund raise you still have to borrow, and banks give at their own rate. Bank rate is not reduced by leverage — if the business is more, it does not reduce.
14. State-wise AUM mix
Moderator (chat - Kartik Srinivas), Unknown
Question. What is the share of Rajasthan and how will it change 3 years down the line? Which states are we focusing on now?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Earlier we did 60-70% business in Rajasthan. As we started other states the share has come down — 44% in March, 42% in Q1 and now 40% this quarter. Karnataka is the new focus state.
15. FY26 targets
Moderator (chat - Arvind Kumar), Unknown
Question. What are the AUM and disbursement targets for FY26?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. AUM target for FY26 is INR970 cr and disbursement is INR400 cr.
16. DPD bucket analysis
Harshil Bhayani, Unknown
Question. Confirming — you said 1+ DPD is 12%? Last year same quarter 0-30 DPD was 3.26% and 30+ was 3.5%. What is the reason for this increase? Is there any stress in the books?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. If you subtract the buckets: 0-30 DPD is 4.65%, 30-60 DPD is 3.48%, 60-90 DPD is 1.96%, and the total average (90+) is 1.88%. It is normal — 0.5% up and down keeps happening. The total is 12% for 1+ DPD.
17. Branch strategy in Rajasthan
Moderator (chat - Ravi Rohit), Unknown
Question. Why do we not have a larger number of branches in Rajasthan itself, given we are from Rajasthan?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. If we come to A rating then we will start branches there. Rating companies expect multiple state presence, which is why we expanded. When we move from BBB to A, we will focus on Rajasthan and other places.
18. DPD trend and AUM guidance revision
Aditya A, Unknown
Question. What is the trend of 0-30 DPD and 30-60 DPD — how was it last quarter and how is it this quarter? What GNPA and NNPA level can we expect by year end? And earlier AUM guidance was around INR1,000 cr by year end — has it been reduced?
Answer, Vinod Kumar Jain, Managing Director. Last quarter 0-30 DPD was 4.10%, now 4.65%; 30-60 DPD was 3.75% now 3.48%; 60-90 DPD was 1.79% now 1.96%. In the rural sector we have never seen a big difference — 1% up and down — so we won't expect it to go down significantly, it will be around current levels. The AUM guidance change is because of the NHB reduction in LAP portion. Housing loan disbursements are not 100% upfront — if I do INR50 cr business, only INR15-20 cr is actually disbursed.
Partly answered.
What was said
Topic by topic, in the order it was spoken
Q2 Financial Performance · Vinod Kumar Jain (MD)
- Loan book grew 33.21% YoY to INR867 cr from INR651 cr in Q2 FY25
- Disbursement up 85% YoY to INR117 cr from INR63 cr in Q2 FY25
- Income grew 32% YoY to INR48 cr from INR37 cr; PAT up 25% to INR8 cr from INR6 cr
- Net worth grew 38% to INR279 cr from INR202 cr
- Gross NPA at 1.88% (vs 1.96% YoY) and Net NPA at 0.64% (vs 0.59% YoY)
Funding & Borrowings · Vinod Kumar Jain (MD)
- Outstanding borrowings at INR685 cr vs INR542 cr in the prior quarter
- Borrowing mix: Bank 45%, NHB 4%, NCD 7%, Financial Institutions 44%
- INR50 cr NCD issued in Q2 and additional INR26 cr NCD in the current quarter; mutual fund invested INR50 cr in NCD — first such subscription
- Liquid fund of INR132 cr plus INR70 cr of undrawn sanctions provides strong liquidity
Yield, Spread and Cost Metrics · Vinod Kumar Jain (MD)
- Borrowing cost at 10.99% in Q2 FY26 vs 11.03% in Q2 FY25 — a marginal decline
- Credit cost at 1.66% vs 1.81% YoY, reflecting improved asset quality
- Lending rate 20% and spread of 9% (NIM); NHB constraints noted as reason for lower NIM
- CRAR ratio strong at 42.68%
Credit Rating and Expansion · Vinod Kumar Jain (MD)
- Credit rating outlook improved from BBB+ stable to BBB+ positive
- Total branches at 93 with target of 100 by end of FY26
- FY26 AUM target of INR970 cr and disbursement target of INR400 cr reaffirmed
- Management thanked investors and opened the floor for Q&A
In their words
Our focus is not on the share market. Our focus is that we will take it only when the fund is needed.
It is a matter of great joy that the mutual fund has also invested in the NCD of INR50 crore.
In finance, you should run with discipline. You should not take shortcuts. ... This is our discipline. If we run with discipline, then we will run for a long time.
To check next time
What management committed to on this call, or the dates they gave.
- Q3 FY26 disbursement of INR150 cr as guided.
- Q4 FY26 disbursement of INR150 cr.
- FY26 AUM target of INR970 cr and crossing INR1,000 cr for A- rating trigger.
- Branch network reaching 100 by year-end.
- GNPA/NNPA movement; 0-30 DPD at 4.65%, 30-60 at 3.48%, 60-90 at 1.96%.
- Adherence to 70-30 housing-to-LAP mix under NHB norms.
Transcript
We have not transcribed this call's recording. Read the company's transcript (PDF).
The stock after the call
| After the call | Close | Stock | Nifty 50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next session Fri 14 Nov 2025 | ₹280.30 | −0.97% | +0.12% |
| 5 sessions Thu 20 Nov 2025 | ₹261.85 | −7.49% | +1.21% |
| 20 sessions Thu 11 Dec 2025 | ₹267.75 | −5.41% | +0.07% |
From the close of Thu 13 Nov 2025, ₹283.05: the close before the call day (the call's time is not on file). Adjusted daily closes; the move includes everything else that happened in those sessions.