Models
BAMBINO AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD.BSE 519295Food Products
₹97per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹97implied FY26 P/E 7.9× · EV/EBITDA 5.5×
Against CMP ₹230.70−58.2%close of 28 Oct 2026
Growth the CMP implies—%no growth rate between −20% and 45% a year brings the value to the CMP on your other inputs
Value after FY3171%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹53₹184
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹174₹280
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 49 |
| PV of terminal value | 118 |
| Enterprise value | 167 |
| less net debt | (90) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 77 |
| ÷ 0.80 crore shares | ₹97 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 103 | 118 | 136 | 157 | 184 |
| 10.50% | 88 | 100 | 114 | 132 | 153 |
| 11.00% | 74 | 85 | 97 | 111 | 128 |
| 11.50% | 63 | 71 | 82 | 93 | 107 |
| 12.00% | 53 | 60 | 69 | 79 | 90 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹230.70; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 34 · 95 · 156 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.81 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.43 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.35 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 303 | 332 | 368 | 394 | 421 | 451 | 482 | 516 | 552 |
| growth % | 17.8 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| EBITDA | 21 | 27 | 27 | 30 | 32 | 35 | 37 | 40 | 43 |
| margin % | 7.0 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| less depreciation | (4) | (5) | (5) | (6) | (6) | (7) | (7) | (8) | (8) |
| EBIT | 17 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 34 |
| less tax on EBIT | (8) | (8) | (9) | (9) | (10) | (11) | |||
| NOPAT | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 23 | |||
| add depreciation | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| less capex | (6) | (9) | (7) | (3) | (3) | (4) | (6) | (8) | (10) |
| less working-capital build | — | (8) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (10) | |||
| Free cash flow to firm | (7) | 17 | (11) | — | 13 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 11 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||||
| Present value | 13 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 7 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 91, dividends at 12.8% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 24 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 34 |
| Interest at 11.1% on debt | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | (10) | |
| Profit before tax | 16 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 24 | |
| Profit after tax | 10 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 |
| Dividends | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 1 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 20 |
| Working capital | 113 | 121 | 129 | 138 | 148 | 158 |
| Net block and other assets | 121 | 118 | 116 | 115 | 115 | 116 |
| Debt | 91 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 91 |
| Equity | 110 | 119 | 130 | 142 | 155 | 169 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 9 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
| Investing (capex) | (3) | (4) | (6) | (8) | (10) | |
| Financing (dividends) | (1) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | |
| Net change in cash | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 7% | 7.7% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹97 | (58.2)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.