Models
SAKUMA EXPORTS LIMITEDSAKUMA
₹2per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹2implied FY26 P/E 23.5× · EV/EBITDA 31.7×
Against CMP ₹1.67−1.3%close of 28 Oct 2026
Growth the CMP implies—%no growth rate between −20% and 45% a year brings the value to the CMP on your other inputs
Value after FY3197%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹1₹2
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹1₹3
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 8 |
| PV of terminal value | 221 |
| Enterprise value | 228 |
| less net debt | 30 |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 258 |
| ÷ 156.77 crore shares | ₹2 |
97% of the value sits after FY31. Usual when return on capital sits near the cost of capital; the 5 explicit years carry little of it.
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 10.50% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 11.00% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 11.50% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 12.00% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹1.67; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 1 · 2 · 2 |
| Draws below the CMP | 54% |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.99 |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.16 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.03 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 3,173 | 2,125 | 2,290 | 1,708 | 1,623 | 1,542 | 1,465 | 1,391 | 1,322 |
| growth % | 11.2 | (33.0) | 7.8 | (25.4) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) | (5.0) |
| EBITDA | 39 | 36 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| margin % | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| less depreciation | (1) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |
| EBIT | 38 | 35 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| less tax on EBIT | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | |||
| NOPAT | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| add depreciation | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| less capex | (0) | 0 | (67) | (47) | (45) | (33) | (22) | (12) | (3) |
| less working-capital build | — | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | |||
| Free cash flow to firm | 91 | (85) | (205) | — | (15) | (5) | 5 | 13 | 21 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | ||||
| Present value | (15) | (4) | 4 | 9 | 13 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 9, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Interest at 3% on debt | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
| Profit before tax | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| Profit after tax | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividends | (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 39 | 24 | 19 | 23 | 36 | 57 |
| Working capital | 483 | 459 | 436 | 414 | 393 | 374 |
| Net block and other assets | 419 | 461 | 491 | 510 | 520 | 520 |
| Debt | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Equity | 749 | 751 | 753 | 756 | 758 | 759 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 30 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 24 | |
| Investing (capex) | (45) | (33) | (22) | (12) | (3) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | (16) | (5) | 5 | 13 | 21 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | (16) | (5) | 5 | 13 | 21 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | -5% | 0.4% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹2 | (1.3)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.