Models
SHREE VASU LOGISTICS LTDSVLLTransport Services
₹65per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹65implied FY26 P/E 10.4× · EV/EBITDA 3.3×
Against CMP ₹816.00−92.1%close of 2026-09-20
Growth the CMP implies45.0%revenue, a year for 5 years, on your other inputs
Value after FY3159%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹35₹123
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹445₹897
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 77 |
| PV of terminal value | 112 |
| Enterprise value | 189 |
| less net debt | (115) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 74 |
| ÷ 1.15 crore shares | ₹65 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 69 | 79 | 91 | 105 | 123 |
| 10.50% | 59 | 67 | 76 | 88 | 102 |
| 11.00% | 50 | 57 | 65 | 74 | 85 |
| 11.50% | 42 | 48 | 55 | 62 | 72 |
| 12.00% | 35 | 40 | 46 | 52 | 60 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹816.00; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | (22) · 63 · 148 |
| Draws below the CMP | 100% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.98 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.16 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.02 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 224 | 242 | 261 | 282 | 305 | 329 |
| growth % | — | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| EBITDA | 57 | 61 | 66 | 72 | 77 | 84 |
| margin % | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.4 |
| less depreciation | (36) | (39) | (42) | (45) | (49) | (53) |
| EBIT | 21 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 |
| less tax on EBIT | (4) | (4) | (4) | (5) | (5) | (5) |
| NOPAT | 17 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 26 |
| add depreciation | 36 | 39 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 53 |
| less capex | (27) | (29) | (36) | (44) | (53) | (63) |
| less working-capital build | — | (3) | (3) | (4) | (4) | (4) |
| Free cash flow to firm | — | 26 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 11 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | |
| Present value | 25 | 20 | 15 | 11 | 7 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 116, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 21 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 |
| Interest at 15.3% on debt | (18) | (18) | (18) | (18) | (18) | |
| Profit before tax | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | |
| Profit after tax | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 1 | 12 | 21 | 26 | 27 | 23 |
| Working capital | 39 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 53 | 57 |
| Net block and other assets | 222 | 212 | 205 | 204 | 208 | 219 |
| Debt | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 |
| Equity | 40 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 66 | 77 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 40 | 44 | 49 | 54 | 59 | |
| Investing (capex) | (29) | (36) | (44) | (53) | (63) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 11 | 8 | 5 | 1 | (4) | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 11 | 8 | 5 | 1 | (4) | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 8% | 25.4% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹65 | (92.1)% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.