Models
Sprayking LimitedBSE 540079Industrial Products
₹2per share · Base Model Note
Revenue growth, the horizon and scenarios are yours to change. Every other input is part of the Trader plan; saving, sharing a saved link and the live-formula workbook are part of the Institutional plan.
Scenario
Value per share, your model₹2implied FY26 P/E 1.9× · EV/EBITDA 6.9×
Against CMP ₹1.14+39.6%close of 8 Oct 2026
Growth the CMP implies—%no growth rate between −20% and 45% a year brings the value to the CMP on your other inputs
Value after FY3162%share of enterprise value in the terminal
This figure is the arithmetic of your inputs and nothing else. MarketPing publishes no fair value, target or rating; the model is yours.
Where the methods land · ₹ per share · the dashed line is the CMP
DCF, rate ±1 · growth ±1your model across the sensitivity grid
₹1₹3
52-week rangetraded range, a fact not a value
₹1₹2
From enterprise to equity · ₹ crore
| PV of FY27–FY31 free cash flow | 22 |
| PV of terminal value | 36 |
| Enterprise value | 58 |
| less net debt | (24) |
| less non-controlling interest | 0 |
| add non-operating investments | 0 |
| Equity value | 34 |
| ÷ 21.14 crore shares | ₹2 |
Free cash flow, filed and modelled · ₹ '000 crore
Filed, cash from operations − capexModelled free cash flow to firm
Sensitivity · ₹ per share
Down Across| WACC ↓terminal growth → | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 6.0% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 10.50% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 11.00% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 11.50% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 12.00% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
The outlined cell is your model. Green figures sit above the CMP of ₹1.14; n/a marks a terminal growth at or above the discount rate. Steps: WACC and terminal growth ±0.5 point, growth ±2, margin ±1.
Distribution of outcomes · 4,000 draws · growth, margin and the discount rate vary together
| 10th · 50th · 90th percentile, ₹ per share | 1 · 2 · 2 |
| Draws below the CMP | 16% |
| Rank correlation with ebitda margin | +0.87 |
| Rank correlation with discount rate | −0.44 |
| Rank correlation with revenue growth | −0.12 |
Each driver is drawn from a PERT distribution between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios (or ±50% growth, ±20% margin when there is one scenario), with the discount rate ±1.5 points. Seeded, so the same inputs give the same picture.
Projected cash flow to the firm · ₹ crore
History Forward| ₹ crore | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 102 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 136 |
| growth % | — | 25.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| EBITDA | 15 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| margin % | 15.1 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| less depreciation | (2) | (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |
| EBIT | 13 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| less tax on EBIT | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||
| NOPAT | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
| add depreciation | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| less capex | (7) | (11) | 0 | 0 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
| less working-capital build | — | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||
| Free cash flow to firm | (27) | (18) | — | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Discount factor | 0.949 | 0.855 | 0.770 | 0.694 | 0.625 | |||
| Present value | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
History columns are the filed years (free cash flow there is cash from operations − capex, as filed); the base year and everything to its right come from the engine. Forward is the explicit horizon of the model itself: 3, 5 or 10 years, then flat.
The three statements, projected · ₹ crore · debt held at 24, dividends at 0% of profit
| ₹ crore | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY30 | FY31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||
| EBIT | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Interest at 8% on debt | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | |
| Profit before tax | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Profit after tax | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance sheet, year end | ||||||
| Cash | 0 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 19 |
| Working capital | 51 | 52 | 52 | 53 | 53 | 54 |
| Net block and other assets | 68 | 65 | 62 | 61 | 61 | 61 |
| Debt | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Equity | 81 | 84 | 87 | 90 | 93 | 96 |
| Balance check | 0 | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | (0) |
| Cash flow | ||||||
| From operations | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Investing (capex) | 0 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Financing (dividends) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net change in cash | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| Free cash flow to equity | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
Other liabilities are held at their FY26 level, so the check tests only what the model moves: cash, working capital, net block and other assets, debt and equity. A non-zero check would mean the three statements no longer tie.
Scenarios side by side · ₹ per share
| Scenario | Template | Growth | Margin | Rate | Terminal | ₹ / share | vs CMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base · editing | DCF | 1% | 6.5% | 11.00% | 5% | ₹2 | 39.6% |
A scenario is a full set of inputs under a name. Keep Base as the filed history carried forward; add Bull and Bear by saving the current inputs under those names and moving the two or three assumptions you actually hold a view on. The distribution above draws each driver between the lowest and highest value across your scenarios, so three scenarios give it a real range; with one scenario it falls back to fixed bands.