Revenue rises 39%, but September quarter loss persists

Emphasis of matterResults View source PDF Explain this filing

Price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close

-3.3%Reaction day

₹110.55

prior close

—

announcement price

After-mkt

timing

Nifty Microcap 250market · in no size index; the smallest one is used+1.4%-4.8% vs market

Plastic Products - Industrial peers, median of 44sector+0.7%-4.1% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 4.8 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 4.1 pts less than its Plastic Products - Industrial peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark

Stock

—

10m

—

15m

—

30m

—

Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close

StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector

Reaction day

-3.3+1.4-4.8+0.7-4.1

Next day

-5.2+1.7-7.0+1.4-6.7

-7.1+3.9-11.0+2.3-9.4

-9.0+5.1-14.0+2.6-11.6

-10.8pendingpending+3.5-14.3

—————

15d

—————

UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Plastic Products - Industrial peers, median of 44Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

For the September 2026 quarter, consolidated revenue rose 39% to Rs 243.48 crore from Rs 174.77 crore. Net loss was Rs 8.35 crore, or Rs 4.74 per share. Half-year revenue rose 30% to Rs 464.88 crore, while the loss narrowed to Rs 2.13 crore from Rs 38.45 crore. Cash from operations was Rs 6.92 crore, but finance costs were Rs 38.91 crore. The review had no qualification but drew attention to a Rs 2.34 crore fixed deposit transfer.

Likely market impact

Revenue growth and cash flow are positive, but losses, high finance costs and Rs 654 crore of borrowings may hurt the stock.

By the numbersConsolidated · Q2 FY27

The company's XBRL figures for this quarter look filed in the wrong unit: revenue reads ₹2.43 Cr against ₹174.8 Cr a year ago, about 72× smaller. A move that size is almost always a wrong unit, not a business, so nothing is computed from these figures and no number-based tags are set; the read above is the AI's, from the document.