शुभ दीपावलीDiwali offer: 3 months free on yearly plans · ends 11 NovSee plans
ICICIBANKNSEICICI Bank Limited· BanksHighNegative
Announced Thu, 19 Mar, 2026 · 15:11 IST

ICICI Bank Limited has informed the Exchange regarding 'Disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015'.

ICICIBANK · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-2.5%Reaction day
₹1292.00
prior close
₹1251.20
announcement price
In-mkt
timing
Nifty 100market · index membership as recorded later (tracked since Jun 2026)-3.3%+0.8% vs market
Private Sector Bank peers, median of 19sector-3.1%+0.6% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 0.8 pts more than Nifty 100 and 0.6 pts more than its Private Sector Bank peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
-0.1
10m
+0.4
15m
+0.6
30m
—
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-2.5-3.3+0.8-3.1+0.6
Next day
-3.3-2.8-0.5-3.5+0.2
2d
-5.2-5.5+0.3-8.4+3.2
3d
-3.0-3.9+0.8-5.2+2.2
4d
-2.6-2.2-0.4-2.5-0.1
5d
-4.2-4.3+0.1-5.3+1.1
1w
-6.1-4.8-1.3-5.3-0.8
15d
+4.3+2.4+1.9+4.1+0.1
1m
+4.8+3.3+1.5+5.5-0.7
2m
-3.8+0.3-4.2+4.2-8.0
3m
+4.3+2.6+1.7+18.9-14.6
UpDownMarket · Nifty 100Sector · Private Sector Bank peers, median of 19Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

ICICI Bank has received an order under Section 74 of the Maharashtra GST Act, 2017 from the Additional Commissioner of CGST and CEx., Mumbai East Commissionerate, raising a GST demand of about ₹384.34 crores plus an equivalent amount in penalty and interest. The demand pertains to GST on services the Bank provides to customers who maintain specified minimum balances in their accounts. The Bank notes it is already engaged in litigation, including a writ petition, on similar issues raised in past orders and show cause notices. It is reporting the matter only because the cumulative amount crosses the materiality threshold, and intends to contest the order through a fresh writ petition within the prescribed timelines.

Likely market impact

This is a tax demand that the Bank will challenge in court, so the near-term financial hit is unlikely unless the order is upheld. The Bank's prior similar litigation efforts may cushion any adverse outcome, but the case is a watchable overhang for shareholders.