JSFBNSEJana Small Finance Bank Limited· BanksHighNegative
Announced Tue, 26 Aug, 2025 · 16:56 IST

Jana Small Finance Bank Limited has informed the Exchange about Action(s) taken or orders passed

JSFB · price

Loading chart…

▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.

Price reactionminutes from the announcement price · days from the prior close
-0.3%Reaction day
₹490.00
prior close
₹490.00
announcement price
After-mkt
timing
Nifty Microcap 250market · index membership as recorded later (tracked since Jun 2026)-0.7%+0.4% vs market
Other Bank peers, median of 8sector-1.5%+1.2% vs sector

On the reaction day the stock moved 0.4 pts more than Nifty Microcap 250 and 1.2 pts more than its Other Bank peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.

Minutes after the announcementfrom the announcement price · no benchmark
Stock
5m
-0.4
10m
-1.2
15m
-1.2
30m
-1.3
Sessions after the filingfrom the prior close
StockMarketvs marketSectorvs sector
Reaction day
-0.3-0.7+0.4-1.5+1.2
Next day
+0.6-0.9+1.4-2.1+2.6
2d
+0.0+0.4-0.4-1.6+1.6
3d
+0.0+1.3-1.3-0.8+0.8
4d
-0.0+2.3-2.3-0.4+0.3
5d
-0.2+1.6-1.8+0.3-0.5
1w
-2.6+2.0-4.6+0.1-2.7
15d
-4.8+4.2-9.0+4.1-8.9
1m
-7.1-1.0-6.2-0.4-6.7
2m
-8.9+2.6-11.6+13.9-22.8
3m
-7.6-0.4-7.3+14.6-22.3
UpDownMarket · Nifty Microcap 250Sector · Other Bank peers, median of 8Pending

Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.

AI summary

Jana Small Finance Bank has received a GST order-in-original dated August 25, 2025, from the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru East Commissionerate, Karnataka. The order under section 74(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 confirms a tax demand of Rs. 14.33 crore plus applicable interest, and imposes an equal penalty of Rs. 14.33 crore, taking the total potential outflow to roughly Rs. 28.65 crore. The dispute relates to the bank claiming 50% input tax credit on capital goods under section 17(4), which the tax authority did not accept, calling it a contravention of section 16(3). The demand covers financial years 2018-19 to 2022-23. The bank plans to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and does not view the order as having a material financial impact, stating the position is legally defensible.

Likely market impact

Although the combined demand and penalty is sizeable, the bank is contesting the order and believes its tax treatment is defensible, so near-term impact is expected to be limited. Shareholders should watch the appeal outcome, as an unfavorable ruling could create a meaningful one-time hit to earnings.