This filing is part of the company’s quarterly result. Read the full results article, with every figure explained →
PVP Ventures Limited has submitted to the Exchange, the financial results for the period ended Jun 30, 2025.
PVP · price
▲ positive · ▼ negative · ● neutral filings · teal = economic event · numbered = multiple that day (click to pick). Times IST.
On the reaction day the stock moved 5.5 pts less than Nifty Microcap 250 and 5.6 pts less than its Residential Commercial Projects peers, over the same two closes: a difference in percentage points, not a measure of what the filing did.
Minute windows have no benchmark: there is no intraday index history to compare against.
PVP Ventures submitted Q1 FY26 results with standalone revenue from operations of ₹919.28 lakhs (vs nil in Q1 FY25) and total income of ₹1,275.85 lakhs, swinging to a net profit of ₹78.19 lakhs from a loss of ₹138.64 lakhs year-on-year. However, finance costs surged to ₹805.75 lakhs (vs ₹110.63 lakhs) due to amortization of NCD issuance costs after the company allotted ₹15,000 lakhs of secured NCDs in April 2025. The auditor flagged multiple emphasis-of-matter items: SEBI summons to the company, CEO and MD over past related-party transactions with erstwhile subsidiaries; a ₹21,843.49 lakh interest-free loan to related party NCCPL whose underlying land is under ED/SEBI attachment; a ₹2,800 lakh receivable from PHML (related party with negative net worth and continuing losses); pending GST, income tax, stamp duty and SEBI appeals; and a ₹669.69 lakh exceptional impairment on the HHT acquisition. The company also completed acquisitions of Optimus Oncology (56%) and Biohygea Global/Medilabs (52%) during the quarter.
Shareholders should weigh the SEBI investigation, large unprovided related-party exposures (over ₹24,600 lakhs to NCCPL and PHML combined), negative other equity of ₹(4,953.95) lakhs, and very weak debt service (0.14) and interest coverage (0.18) ratios, all of which signal elevated risk despite the return to quarterly profit.
The company's XBRL figures for this quarter look filed in the wrong unit: revenue reads ₹17.21 Cr against ₹2.52 Cr a year ago, about 7× larger. A move that size is almost always a wrong unit, not a business, so nothing is computed from these figures and no number-based tags are set; the read above is the AI's, from the document.