North Bihar Power Distribution Co Ltd vs Company — writ before Patna HC challenging arbitral orders; involves ₹45.78 million dispute plus ₹123.14 million bank guarantees (combined ~₹16.892 crore)
Lumino Industries IPO
Lumino Industries IPO is a mainboard IPO raising ₹700 Cr at ₹78 – ₹82 a share. It listed on 3 Sept 2026 at ₹110, +34.1% against its issue price of ₹82, and trades at ₹108 today (+31.6% since issue). It was subscribed 118× in total.
118.1 times more demand than shares on offer
populated partly populated we hold nothing here — the tab says why
What’s in court
The issuer’s own summary of outstanding legal proceedings — SEBI requires this table in every prospectus. Counts and amounts are as disclosed; the disclosed aggregate at stake is ₹25 Cr.
| Against | Criminal | Tax | Other material | Amount at stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The company | 19 | 5 | 10 | ₹24 Cr |
| Promoters | 0 | 4 | 0 | ₹0.6 Cr |
| Directors | 2 | 4 | 0 | ₹0.6 Cr |
| Subsidiaries | 0 | 0 | 0 | ₹0.0 Cr |
South Bihar Power Distribution Co Ltd vs Company — writ before Patna HC challenging ex-parte arbitral award of ₹33.42 million in Company's favour and ₹118.86 million bank guarantees (~₹15.228 crore)
Company vs Union of India & others — writ before Calcutta HC challenging ex-parte GST order demanding ₹64.66 million tax + ₹50.57 million interest + ₹12.93 million penalty (aggregate demand ~₹128.16 million / ₹12.816 crore); Company also seeks refund of ₹74.29 million
Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata vs Company — appeal before Calcutta HC challenging CESTAT order; alleges ₹94.67 million customs duty evasion under advance authorisations (₹9.467 crore)
UPPCB vs Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd & its then-directors (including Director Shalu Laxmanraj Bhandari) — three criminal complaints under Water Act, 1974 for alleged trade effluent violations at three sugar units; cognizance taken, Section 482 CrPC applications pending before Allahabad HC
Section does not contain a single SEBI summary table near the start; counts are derived from detailed categorised disclosures. The only explicit aggregate summary table is the Tax proceedings table on p437 (Company direct tax 1 case/₹2.30 million; Company indirect tax 4 cases/₹233.54 million; Promoters direct tax 4 cases/₹5.68 million; Promoters indirect tax Nil; Directors direct tax 4 cases/₹5.68 million; Directors indirect tax Nil; Subsidiaries all Nil). Criminal/regulatory/other counts derived from narrative: Company has 19 criminal complaints filed by it (none against), 1 regulatory action against it (RoC notice u/s 206(1) Companies Act, 2023), 3 other-material proceedings against it and 6 by it; Promoters — Nil across criminal/regulatory/disciplinary/other; Directors — 1 criminal case against (UPPCB/BHSL Water Act matter) and 1 by (Shalu Laxmanraj Bhandari family/maintenance matter); Subsidiaries, KMP and Senior Management — Nil. Conversion applied: 1 crore = 10 million (so 1 million = 0.1 crore). Group companies: not addressed in this excerpt. Aggregate amount column reflects only tax-matters totals stated in the summary table (criminal/other material matters list individual amounts but no aggregate).. Outstanding means unresolved — a listed case is an exposure, not a verdict.
Source documents
What the issuer and the exchanges published. Everything else on this tab is read out of these.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.
Which institutions were allotted shares before bidding opened, and how many.
Where physical applications could be submitted.
The issuer's own "basis of issue price": the earnings multiples it is asking for, and the peer companies it chose to compare itself against.
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.