case₹3.6 Crpage 456
Company: 1 direct tax proceeding (amount not stated) and 5 indirect tax proceedings aggregating ₹35.62 million (₹3.562 crore) — the only quantified exposures in the litigation summary.
ListedMainboardTONBO
Tonbo Imaging India IPO
Tonbo Imaging India IPO is a mainboard IPO raising ₹852 Cr at ₹665 – ₹700 a share. It listed on 23 Oct 2026 at ₹1,160, +65.7% against its issue price of ₹700, and trades at ₹1,213 today (+73.3% since issue). It was subscribed 136× in total.
₹700
Issue price
₹1,213
Price now
+73.3%
Since issue price
23 Oct 2026
Listed on
136×Subscribed (final) · all exchanges
135.9 times more demand than shares on offer
populated partly populated we hold nothing here — the tab says why
What’s in court
The issuer’s own summary of outstanding legal proceedings — SEBI requires this table in every prospectus. Counts and amounts are as disclosed; the disclosed aggregate at stake is ₹3.6 Cr.
| Against | Criminal | Tax | Other material | Amount at stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The company | 0 | 6 | 1 | ₹3.6 Cr |
| Promoters | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Directors | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Subsidiaries | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Group companies | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
case₹0.8 Crpage 457
Singapore High Court suit by Mr. Harshad Ajit Lahoti (minority shareholder of group company CEAQ Singapore) against CEAQ Singapore, the Company, Promoter/CEO Arvind Kondangi Lakshmikumar and Nominee Director Amit Dilip Shah, alleging failure to extend preference share subscription to him and oppression of his interests; seeks buyout, winding up, allotment of 51,000 Equity Shares, or equitable compensation. Not yet served on the Company/Directors.
casepage 454
FIR filed by Gopal Das against Independent Director Rishikesha Krishnan at Mico Layout Police Station, Bangalore, under sections 3(1)(r)/(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sections 351(2)/(3) of the Bharatiya Sanhita, 2023; further investigation stayed by Karnataka High Court (interim order dated December 31, 2024). Matter pending.
Amounts converted from ₹ million to ₹ crore (1 crore = 10 million). The same Singapore High Court Suit is counted once each against the Company, Promoter (Arvind Kondangi Lakshmikumar) and Nominee Director (Amit Dilip Shah) per the '#' footnote to the summary table on page 456; it is also the sole matter involving the Group Company (CEAQ Singapore). Total amount of ₹35.62 million = 3.562 crore represents tax proceedings only; amounts for civil/criminal matters were stated as Nil/not quantifiable. No disciplinary actions by SEBI/stock exchanges against Promoters in the last five years.. Outstanding means unresolved — a listed case is an exposure, not a verdict.
Source documents
What the issuer and the exchanges published. Everything else on this tab is read out of these.
Prospectus on SEBI ↗
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.
Anchor investor allocation ↗
Which institutions were allotted shares before bidding opened, and how many.
Bidding centres ↗
Where physical applications could be submitted.
Basis of issue price (peer ratios) ↗
The issuer's own "basis of issue price": the earnings multiples it is asking for, and the peer companies it chose to compare itself against.
Red Herring Prospectus ↗
The full prospectus — business, financials, risk factors and litigation.